» Articles » PMID: 39564385

The Farver-Campos Labor Coping Scale As a Replacement for the 10-Point Pain Scale for Labor

Overview
Journal J Perinat Educ
Publisher Springer
Date 2024 Nov 20
PMID 39564385
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The 10-point pain scale was developed to avoid undertreated pain in the hospital setting. Developed in a Veterans Administration hospital for medical-surgical patients in 2003, the 10-point pain scale was adopted in health care as part of the "pain as the fifth vital sign" initiative. The pain scale was implemented in maternity care as part of a general hospital initiative. Assessing coping is more appropriate to the labor process than focusing on pain or its avoidance. The Farver-Campos Labor Coping Scale is evidence-based and promotes vaginal birth and personal labor care by guiding nurses and laboring women through a number of coping options. The scale is an appropriate tool to replace the 10-point pain scale in the maternity care setting.

References
1.
Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, Alfirevic Z, Gates S, Newburn M . Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; (3):CD009234. PMC: 7132546. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009234.pub2. View

2.
Alsomali Z, Bajamal E, Esheaba O . The Effect of Structured Antenatal Education on Childbirth Self-Efficacy. Cureus. 2023; 15(5):e39285. PMC: 10202686. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.39285. View

3.
Sanders R . Functional discomfort and a shift in midwifery paradigm. Women Birth. 2015; 28(3):e87-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.03.001. View

4.
Cleeland C, Reyes-Gibby C, Schall M, Nolan K, Paice J, Rosenberg J . Rapid improvement in pain management: the Veterans Health Administration and the institute for healthcare improvement collaborative. Clin J Pain. 2003; 19(5):298-305. DOI: 10.1097/00002508-200309000-00003. View

5.
Caton D, Corry M, Frigoletto F, Hopkins D, Lieberman E, Mayberry L . The nature and management of labor pain: executive summary. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 186(5S):S1-15. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(02)70178-6. View