The Doctors, Their Patients, and the Symptom Checker App: Qualitative Interview Study With General Practitioners in Germany

Overview

Journal JMIR Hum Factors

Specialty Health Services

Date 2024 Nov 18

PMID 39556813

Authors

Christine Preiser

Natalia Radionova

Eylem Og

Roland Koch

Malte Klemmt

Regina Muller

Robert Ranisch

Stefanie Joos

Monika A Rieger

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Symptom checkers are designed for laypeople and promise to provide a preliminary diagnosis, a sense of urgency, and a suggested course of action.

Objective: We used the international symptom checker app (SCA) Ada App as an example to answer the following question: How do general practitioners (GPs) experience the SCA in relation to the macro, meso, and micro level of their daily work, and how does this interact with work-related psychosocial resources and demands?

Methods: We conducted 8 semistructured interviews with GPs in Germany between December 2020 and February 2022. We analyzed the data using the integrative basic method, an interpretative-reconstructive method, to identify core themes and modes of thematization.

Results: Although most GPs in this study were open to digitization in health care and their practice, only one was familiar with the SCA. GPs considered the SCA as part of the "unorganized stage" of patients' searching about their conditions. Some preferred it to popular search engines. They considered it relevant to their work as soon as the SCA would influence patients' decisions to see a doctor. Some wanted to see the results of the SCA in advance in order to decide on the patient's next steps. GPs described the diagnostic process as guided by shared decision-making, with the GP taking the lead and the patient deciding. They saw diagnosis as an act of making sense of data, which the SCA would not be able to do, despite the huge amounts of data.

Conclusions: GPs took a techno-pragmatic view of SCA. They operate in a health care system of increasing scarcity. They saw the SCA as a potential work-related resource if it helped them to reduce administrative tasks and unnecessary patient contacts. The SCA was seen as a potential work-related demand if it increased workload, for example, if it increased patients' anxiety, was too risk-averse, or made patients more insistent on their own opinions.

References

Johnson J, Hall E . Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. Am J Public Health. 1988; 78(10):1336-42. PMC: 1349434. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.78.10.1336. View

Lupton D, Jutel A . 'It's like having a physician in your pocket!' A critical analysis of self-diagnosis smartphone apps. Soc Sci Med. 2015; 133:128-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.004. View

Radionova N, Og E, Wetzel A, Rieger M, Preiser C . Impacts of Symptom Checkers for Laypersons' Self-diagnosis on Physicians in Primary Care: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e39219. PMC: 10262026. DOI: 10.2196/39219. View

ENGLE Jr R, Davis B . MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS: PRESENT, PAST, AND FUTURE. I. PRESENT CONCEPTS OF THE MEANING AND LIMITATIONS OF MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS. Arch Intern Med. 1963; 112:512-9. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.1963.03860040108009. View

Fogel A, Kvedar J . Artificial intelligence powers digital medicine. NPJ Digit Med. 2019; 1:5. PMC: 6548340. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-017-0012-2. View

de Swaan A . The reluctant imperialism of the medical profession. Soc Sci Med. 1989; 28(11):1165-70. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90009-9. View

Fiske A, Buyx A, Prainsack B . The double-edged sword of digital self-care: Physician perspectives from Northern Germany. Soc Sci Med. 2020; 260:113174. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113174. View

Hennemann S, Kuhn S, Witthoft M, Jungmann S . Diagnostic Performance of an App-Based Symptom Checker in Mental Disorders: Comparative Study in Psychotherapy Outpatients. JMIR Ment Health. 2022; 9(1):e32832. PMC: 8844983. DOI: 10.2196/32832. View

Gottliebsen K, Petersson G . Limited evidence of benefits of patient operated intelligent primary care triage tools: findings of a literature review. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2020; 27(1). PMC: 7245402. DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100114. View

10.

Malterud K, Siersma V, Guassora A . Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power. Qual Health Res. 2015; 26(13):1753-1760. DOI: 10.1177/1049732315617444. View

11.

OBrien B, Harris I, Beckman T, Reed D, Cook D . Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014; 89(9):1245-51. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388. View

12.

Jutel A, Lupton D . Digitizing diagnosis: a review of mobile applications in the diagnostic process. Diagnosis (Berl). 2018; 2(2):89-96. DOI: 10.1515/dx-2014-0068. View

13.

Behmann M, Schmiemann G, Lingner H, Kuhne F, Hummers-Pradier E, Schneider N . Job satisfaction among primary care physicians: results of a survey. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012; 109(11):193-200. PMC: 3317533. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0193. View

14.

Lee K, Hoti K, Hughes J, Emmerton L . Consumer Use of "Dr Google": A Survey on Health Information-Seeking Behaviors and Navigational Needs. J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17(12):e288. PMC: 4710847. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4345. View

15.

Summerton N, Cansdale M . Artificial intelligence and diagnosis in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2019; 69(684):324-325. PMC: 6592326. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X704165. View

16.

Timmermans S, Berg M . The practice of medical technology. Sociol Health Illn. 2003; 25:97-114. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.00342. View

17.

Antunes B, Harding R, Higginson I . Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: a systematic review of facilitators and barriers. Palliat Med. 2013; 28(2):158-75. DOI: 10.1177/0269216313491619. View

18.

ENGLE Jr R . Attempts to use computers as diagnostic aids in medical decision making: a thirty-year experience. Perspect Biol Med. 1992; 35(2):207-19. DOI: 10.1353/pbm.1992.0011. View

19.

Hummers-Pradier E, Scheidt-Nave C, Martin H, Heinemann S, Kochen M, Himmel W . Simply no time? Barriers to GPs' participation in primary health care research. Fam Pract. 2008; 25(2):105-12. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmn015. View

20.

Wattanapisit A, Hai Teo C, Wattanapisit S, Teoh E, Woo W, Jenn Ng C . Can mobile health apps replace GPs? A scoping review of comparisons between mobile apps and GP tasks. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020; 20(1):5. PMC: 6945711. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-019-1016-4. View