Assessing Key Soft Skills in Organizational Contexts: Development and Validation of the Multiple Soft Skills Assessment Tool

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2024 Nov 18

PMID 39554711

Authors

Daiana Colledani

Egidio Robusto

Pasquale Anselmi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Soft skills, also known as transversal skills, have gained significant attention in the organizational context due to their positive impact on various work-related outcomes. The present study aimed to develop and validate the Multiple Soft Skills Assessment Tool (MSSAT), a short self-report instrument that evaluates interpersonal skills (initiative-resourcefulness, assertiveness, conflict management), interpersonal communication skills, decision-making style (adaptive and maladaptive), and moral integrity.

Methods: The scale development process involved selecting and adapting relevant items from existing scales and employing a cross-validation approach with a large sample of workers from diverse organizational settings and job positions ( = 639). In the first step, 28 items were carefully chosen from an item pool of 64 items based on their content, factor loadings, item response theory analyses, differential item functioning, and fit statistics. Next, the structure of the resulting scale was evaluated through confirmatory factor analyses.

Results: The MSSAT demonstrated gender invariance and good reliability and validity. The results of a network analysis confirmed the relationships between soft skills and positive work-related outcomes. Notably, interpersonal communication skills and moral integrity emerged as crucial skills.

Discussion: The MSSAT is a valuable tool for organizations to assess the soft skills of their employees, thereby contributing to design targeted development programs.

References

Widad A, Abdellah G . Strategies Used to Teach Soft Skills in Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Scoping Review. J Prof Nurs. 2022; 42:209-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.07.010. View

Fagnani M, Devita M, Colledani D, Anselmi P, Sergi G, Mapelli D . Religious assessment in Italian older adults: psychometric properties of the Francis Scale of Attitude toward Christianity and the Behavioral Religiosity Scale. Exp Aging Res. 2021; 47(5):478-493. DOI: 10.1080/0361073X.2021.1913938. View

Anselmi P, Colledani D, Andreotti A, Robusto E, Fabbris L, Vian P . An Item Response Theory-Based Scoring of the South Oaks Gambling Screen-Revised Adolescents. Assessment. 2021; 29(7):1381-1391. DOI: 10.1177/10731911211017657. View

Ceschi A, Demerouti E, Sartori R, Weller J . Decision-Making Processes in the Workplace: How Exhaustion, Lack of Resources and Job Demands Impair Them and Affect Performance. Front Psychol. 2017; 8:313. PMC: 5418353. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00313. View

Colledani D, Anselmi P, Robusto E . Development of a scale for capturing psychological aspects of physical-digital integration: relationships with psychosocial functioning and facial emotion recognition. AI Soc. 2023; :1-13. PMC: 10031718. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-023-01646-9. View

Epskamp S, Borsboom D, Fried E . Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behav Res Methods. 2017; 50(1):195-212. PMC: 5809547. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1. View

Bentler P . Alpha, Dimension-Free, and Model-Based Internal Consistency Reliability. Psychometrika. 2010; 74(1):137-143. PMC: 2786226. DOI: 10.1007/s11336-008-9100-1. View

Colledani D, Camperio Ciani A . A Worldwide Internet Study Based on Implicit Association Test Revealed a Higher Prevalence of Adult Males' Androphilia than Ever Reported Before. J Sex Med. 2020; 18(1):4-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.09.011. View

Boateng G, Neilands T, Frongillo E, Melgar-Quinonez H, Young S . Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer. Front Public Health. 2018; 6:149. PMC: 6004510. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. View

10.

Soto C, Napolitano C, Sewell M, Yoon H, Roberts B . An integrative framework for conceptualizing and assessing social, emotional, and behavioral skills: The BESSI. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022; 123(1):192-222. DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000401. View

11.

Lalor J, Wu H, Yu H . Building an Evaluation Scale using Item Response Theory. Proc Conf Empir Methods Nat Lang Process. 2016; 2016:648-657. PMC: 5167538. DOI: 10.18653/v1/d16-1062. View

12.

Fisher G, Matthews R, Gibbons A . Developing and investigating the use of single-item measures in organizational research. J Occup Health Psychol. 2015; 21(1):3-23. DOI: 10.1037/a0039139. View

13.

Emold C, Schneider N, Meller I, Yagil Y . Communication skills, working environment and burnout among oncology nurses. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2010; 15(4):358-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2010.08.001. View

14.

Sharma H . How short or long should be a questionnaire for any research? Researchers dilemma in deciding the appropriate questionnaire length. Saudi J Anaesth. 2022; 16(1):65-68. PMC: 8846243. DOI: 10.4103/sja.sja_163_21. View

15.

Buhrmester D, Furman W, Wittenberg M, Reis H . Five domains of interpersonal competence in peer relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 55(6):991-1008. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.55.6.991. View

16.

Epskamp S, Fried E . A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. Psychol Methods. 2018; 23(4):617-634. DOI: 10.1037/met0000167. View

17.

De Carlo A, Dal Corso L, Carluccio F, Colledani D, Falco A . Positive Supervisor Behaviors and Employee Performance: The Serial Mediation of Workplace Spirituality and Work Engagement. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:1834. PMC: 7393218. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01834. View

18.

Comrey A . Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988; 56(5):754-61. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.56.5.754. View

19.

Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R . Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics. 2007; 9(3):432-41. PMC: 3019769. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm045. View

20.

Guadagnoli E, Velicer W . Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychol Bull. 1988; 103(2):265-275. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.265. View