» Articles » PMID: 39554281

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of USG-guided Versus Blind Pulley Release for Trigger Finger: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2024 Nov 18
PMID 39554281
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To compare the efficacy and safety of the USG-guided vs blind pulley release (PR) for Trigger Finger by performing a meta-analysis of all relevant studies in the published literature.

Methods: A thorough and methodical search of the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was carried out. Review Manager Software (RevMan) 5.4.1 was used to analyze the extracted data, and the results were displayed as forest plots with matching 95 % confidence intervals.

Results: The primary efficacy outcome i.e. residual triggering was significantly lower in USG-guided PR as compared to blind PR with a risk ratio of 0.16 (95 % CI 0.03-0.87), p = 0.03. The primary safety outcome i.e., percentage of complications was lower in the USG-guided procedure group, although the result was not statistically significant with a risk ratio of 0.25 (95 % CI 0.05-1.16), p = 0.08 with I of 0 %. The operation time was longer in the USG-guided PR as compared to the blind procedure, although the difference was not statistically significant with a mean difference of 5.36 (95 % CI: -3.73, 14.46), p = 0.25. The postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score at 4 weeks was significantly lower in USG-guided PR versus blind PR with a mean difference of -0.40 (95 % CI: -0.68, -0.33), p = 0.004.

Conclusion: When compared to blind PR, ultrasound-guided A1 PR for trigger finger was proven to be a safer and more economical method.

References
1.
Lee S, Choi Y, Kang H . Comparative study of ultrasonography-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release versus blinded percutaneous A1 pulley release. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018; 26(2):2309499018772368. DOI: 10.1177/2309499018772368. View

2.
Lapegue F, Andre A, Meyrignac O, Pasquier-Bernachot E, Dupre P, Brun C . US-guided Percutaneous Release of the Trigger Finger by Using a 21-gauge Needle: A Prospective Study of 60 Cases. Radiology. 2016; 280(2):493-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016151886. View

3.
Zhao J, Kan S, Zhao L, Wang Z, Long L, Wang J . Percutaneous first annular pulley release for trigger digits: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence. J Hand Surg Am. 2014; 39(11):2192-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.07.044. View

4.
Rojo-Manaute J, Rodriguez-Maruri G, Capa-Grasa A, Chana-Rodriguez F, Soto M, Vaquero Martin J . Sonographically guided intrasheath percutaneous release of the first annular pulley for trigger digits, part 1: clinical efficacy and safety. J Ultrasound Med. 2012; 31(3):417-24. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.3.417. View

5.
Langer D, Maeir A, Michailevich M, Applebaum Y, Luria S . Using the international classification of functioning to examine the impact of trigger finger. Disabil Rehabil. 2016; 38(26):2530-7. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1137980. View