» Articles » PMID: 39553711

Intra-rater and Inter-rater Reliability of the Fixed Plumb Line for Postural and Scoliosis Assessment in the Sagittal Plane: a Pilot Study

Overview
Journal PeerJ
Date 2024 Nov 18
PMID 39553711
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The plumb line (PL) is a common tool for assessing the sagittal curvatures of the spine, but its accuracy depends on the ability of the physician to use it correctly. This study aimed to present a fixed plumb line (FPL) no longer held by a physician but fixed to a support, evaluating the reliability in posture assessment, comparing it with PL in both adolescent with and without scoliosis.

Methods: The study evaluated the sagittal distances of the spine using a PL and a FPL in 80 young adults aged between 28.7 ± 7.2 and 55 adolescents aged between 12.4 ± 2.3, with and without scoliosis. Two expert and two novice clinicians tested the patients to evaluate the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of FPL. Each clinician assessed participants twice on the same day, with a predetermined time interval (>1 h) to reduce recall bias. Multi-factor multivariate analysis of variance and two-way analysis of variance assessed the statistical significance, while intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC) validated FPL consistency.

Results: FPL provided an ICC coefficient >0.90 for all the measures, while PL an average of 0.70. On AIS patients, PL and FPL showed a significant difference for C7  < 0.001 and T12  < 0.001. The measured parameters were sensitive to gender and age for the FPL, furthermore, the C7 and L3 measurements were statistically different between PL and FPL ( < 0.001). Intra-rater reliability results for FPL ranged from 0.94 to 0.98 across various parameters, while the SEM and MDC values underscore the valuable precision of the FPL with changes exceeding 1 cm being meaningful. These findings suggest that FPL could be a reliable and accurate tool for measuring sagittal distances of the spine in both scoliotic and non-scoliotic patients.

Citing Articles

Letter to the editor: Validation of the visual body image classification in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Daungsupawong H, Wiwanitkit V Asian Spine J. 2025; 19(1):162-163.

PMID: 40037327 PMC: 11895136. DOI: 10.31616/asj.2025.0001.r1.

References
1.
Sabirin J, Bakri R, Buang S, Abdullah A, Shapie A . School scoliosis screening programme-a systematic review. Med J Malaysia. 2011; 65(4):261-7. View

2.
Kwok G, Yip J, Yick K, Cheung M, Tse C, Ng S . Postural Screening for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Infrared Thermography. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):14431. PMC: 5663704. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14556-w. View

3.
Cohen L, Kobayashi S, Simic M, Dennis S, Refshauge K, Pappas E . Non-radiographic methods of measuring global sagittal balance: a systematic review. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017; 12:30. PMC: 5625601. DOI: 10.1186/s13013-017-0135-x. View

4.
Deschenes S, Charron G, Beaudoin G, Labelle H, Dubois J, Miron M . Diagnostic imaging of spinal deformities: reducing patients radiation dose with a new slot-scanning X-ray imager. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(9):989-94. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bdcaa4. View

5.
Weinstein S, Dolan L, Cheng J, Danielsson A, Morcuende J . Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet. 2008; 371(9623):1527-37. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60658-3. View