Comparative Effectiveness of Bariatric Metabolic Surgery Versus Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Mortality: A Meta-Analysis

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly in individuals with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in patients with obesity. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to September 15, 2024. Four observational studies meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed, comprising a total of 247,000 patients. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality. Random effects models were used to calculate pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The results showed that BMS was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE compared to GLP-1RAs (RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.56-0.90, p = 0.004), indicating a 29% reduction in MACE risk. Additionally, BMS demonstrated a 25% reduction in all-cause mortality risk (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.65-0.87, p < 0.0001). These findings suggest that BMS offers superior cardiovascular protection and improved survival outcomes compared to GLP-1RAs in obese patients. The observed benefits may be attributed to more significant reductions in body mass index (BMI) and improvements in metabolic parameters achieved through surgical intervention. However, the limitations of this study, including its observational nature and the limited number of included studies, underscore the need for further research, particularly randomized controlled trials (RCTs), to confirm these findings and guide clinical decision-making in obesity management.