» Articles » PMID: 39552309

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in Cirrhotic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Currently, there is limited evidence regarding the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for patients with liver cirrhosis (LC). We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus warfarin in this population.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus databases from inception to August 2024. Clinical studies comparing the use of DOACs with warfarin in cirrhotic patients were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated by either fixed or random effects models. Primary efficacy outcomes were ischemic stroke/thromboembolism (IS/TE) and all-cause death, the primary safety outcomes were the bleeding risks.

Results: Sixteen studies were included (16 829 individuals). DOACs had similar benefits in preventing IS/TE (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.69-1.10), but DOACs were significantly associated with reduced risk of all-cause death (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.97). On the other hand, we observed significantly reduced risks of any bleeding (HR = 0.60; 95%CI: 0.37-0.95), major bleeding (HR = 0.72; 95%CI: 0.63-0.82), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (HR = 0.47; 95%CI: 0.30-0.73), and gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.60-0.87) in patients receiving DOACs. Results were consistent in cirrhotic patients with AF. Furthermore, DOACs reduced the incidence of major bleeding (HR = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.55-0.78) and ICH (HR = 0.17, 95%CI: 0.04-0.76) in patients with moderate to severe cirrhosis.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that DOACs, compared with warfarin, exerted comparable efficacy and better safety and may represent a safer alternative to warfarin in cirrhotic patients.

References
1.
Xiong J, Xu W, Huang H, Bian J, Wang A, Bai Y . Cirrhosis and risk of stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis. 2018; 275:296-303. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.06.876. View

2.
Kubitza D, Roth A, Becka M, Alatrach A, Halabi A, Hinrichsen H . Effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of rivaroxaban, an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013; 76(1):89-98. PMC: 3703231. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12054. View

3.
Hu T, Li Y, Han W, Maduray K, Chen T, Hao L . Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Cirrhotic Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Update of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2023; 23(6):683-694. DOI: 10.1007/s40256-023-00598-1. View

4.
Nagaoki Y, Aikata H, Daijyo K, Teraoka Y, Shinohara F, Nakamura Y . Efficacy and safety of edoxaban for treatment of portal vein thrombosis following danaparoid sodium in patients with liver cirrhosis. Hepatol Res. 2017; 48(1):51-58. DOI: 10.1111/hepr.12895. View

5.
Munevar Aquite O, Hayes M, Beyene K, Chan A, Schauer C, Wei H . Bleeding risk of oral anticoagulants in liver cirrhosis. N Z Med J. 2022; 135(1563):52-61. DOI: 10.26635/6965.5832. View