» Articles » PMID: 3954945

Emergence of Nitrosourea Resistant Sublines of Lewis Lung Tumour Following MeCCNU Treatment in Vivo

Overview
Journal Br J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 1986 Feb 1
PMID 3954945
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Several different drug retreatment protocols were employed to examine the emergence of resistance to MeCCNU in Lewis lung tumours. Previous studies suggested that although the majority of cells in untreated Lewis lung tumours were sensitive to MeCCNU, there was a very small proportion of resistant cells (approximately 0.001%) that limited "tumour cure' with that drug. If such cells were inherently drug resistant then it should be possible to derive highly resistant tumours by repeated drug treatment. In the first experiment tumours were treated with a single high dose of MeCCNU (35 or 40 mgkg-1) and on regrowth, transplanted into fresh mice and tested for drug sensitivity. Using both excision cell survival and growth delay endpoints, only approximately 25% of tumours were significantly resistant to the test dose, suggesting that many tumours resist the effects of the drug for reasons other than the presence of inherently drug resistant cells. One of the tumours (R4), that regrew after the initial treatment and appeared to be resistant to the test treatment, was retreated with a further 30 mgkg-1 MeCCNU and became more resistant. This line, designated R4/1, was cross-resistant to the other nitrosoureas, BCNU and CCNU, but not to cyclophosphamide, melphalan, cis-platinum or ionising radiation. The effect of treatment dose on the kinetics of MeCCNU resistance development was also studied in a retreatment regimen where the tumours were allowed to regrow and then transplanted into fresh hosts for the next treatment. Resistance developed more quickly at an intermediate dose of 15 mgkg-1 than at 7.5 mgkg-1 where the selective pressure was lower, or at 30 mgkg-1 where there was probably extinction of partially resistant cells. Resistance to MeCCNU developed even more quickly when tumours were retreated several times in the same host, although in a similar experiment with cyclophosphamide no resistance occurred.

Citing Articles

Drug resistance and DNA repair.

Fox M, Roberts J Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1987; 6(3):261-81.

PMID: 3319272 DOI: 10.1007/BF00144267.


In vivo emergence of a highly metastatic tumour cell line from a rat rhabdomyosarcoma after treatment with an alkylating agent.

Antoine E, Pauwels C, Verrelle P, Lascaux V, Poupon M Br J Cancer. 1988; 57(5):469-74.

PMID: 2969255 PMC: 2246398. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1988.109.


Antitumor activity of Ilmofosine (BM 41.440) in the 3Lewis-lung carcinoma model.

Herrmann D, Opitz H, MUNDER P Lipids. 1991; 26(12):1431-6.

PMID: 1819746 DOI: 10.1007/BF02536581.

References
1.
Skipper H, Hutchison D, SCHABEL Jr F, Schmidt L, Goldin A, BROCKMAN R . A quick reference chart on cross resistance between anticancer patients. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1972; 56(4):493-8. View

2.
McMILLAN T, Stephens T, STEEL G . Development of drug resistance in a murine mammary tumour. Br J Cancer. 1985; 52(6):823-32. PMC: 1977285. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1985.265. View

3.
Skipper H, SCHABEL Jr F, Lloyd H . Experimental therapeutics and kinetics: selection and overgrowth of specifically and permanently drug-resistant tumor cells. Semin Hematol. 1978; 15(3):207-19. View

4.
Stephens T, CURRIE G, Peacock J . Repopulation of gamma-irradiated Lewis lung carcinoma by malignant cells and host macrophage progenitors. Br J Cancer. 1978; 38(5):573-82. PMC: 2009782. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1978.252. View

5.
Stephens T, Peacock J . Cell yield and cell survival following chemotherapy of the B16 melanoma. Br J Cancer. 1978; 38(5):591-8. PMC: 2009784. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1978.254. View