» Articles » PMID: 39547235

Local Genetic Correlation Via Knockoffs Reduces Confounding Due to Cross-trait Assortative Mating

Overview
Journal Am J Hum Genet
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Genetics
Date 2024 Nov 15
PMID 39547235
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Local genetic correlation analysis is an important tool for identifying genetic loci with shared biology across traits. Recently, Border et al. have shown that the results of these analyses are confounded by cross-trait assortative mating (xAM), leading to many false-positive findings. Here, we describe LAVA-Knock, a local genetic correlation method that builds off an existing genetic correlation method, LAVA, and augments it by generating synthetic data in a way that preserves local and long-range linkage disequilibrium (LD), allowing us to reduce the confounding induced by xAM. We show in simulations based on a realistic xAM model and in genome-wide association study (GWAS) applications for 630 trait pairs that LAVA-Knock can greatly reduce the bias due to xAM relative to LAVA. Furthermore, we show a significant positive correlation between the reduction in local genetic correlations and estimates in the literature of cross-mate phenotype correlations; in particular, pairs of traits that are known to have high cross-mate phenotype correlation values have a significantly higher reduction in the number of local genetic correlations compared with other trait pairs. A few representative examples include education and intelligence, education and alcohol consumption, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and depression. These results suggest that LAVA-Knock can reduce confounding due to both short-range LD and long-range LD induced by xAM.

References
1.
Bulik-Sullivan B, Finucane H, Anttila V, Gusev A, Day F, Loh P . An atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits. Nat Genet. 2015; 47(11):1236-41. PMC: 4797329. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3406. View

2.
van Rheenen W, Peyrot W, Schork A, Lee S, Wray N . Genetic correlations of polygenic disease traits: from theory to practice. Nat Rev Genet. 2019; 20(10):567-581. DOI: 10.1038/s41576-019-0137-z. View

3.
Nordsletten A, Larsson H, Crowley J, Almqvist C, Lichtenstein P, Mataix-Cols D . Patterns of Nonrandom Mating Within and Across 11 Major Psychiatric Disorders. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016; 73(4):354-61. PMC: 5082975. DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.3192. View

4.
Peyrot W, Robinson M, Penninx B, Wray N . Exploring Boundaries for the Genetic Consequences of Assortative Mating for Psychiatric Traits. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016; 73(11):1189-1195. DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2566. View

5.
He Z, Liu L, Wang C, Guen Y, Lee J, Gogarten S . Identification of putative causal loci in whole-genome sequencing data via knockoff statistics. Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):3152. PMC: 8149672. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22889-4. View