» Articles » PMID: 39544841

Analyzing Postoperative Complications in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: a Systematic Review Enhanced by Artificial Intelligence

Overview
Journal Front Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2024 Nov 15
PMID 39544841
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Colorectal cancer stands as a predominant cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Despite progressive strides in surgical methodologies, the specter of postoperative complications is very large, significantly impacting both morbidity and mortality rates. This review aims to meticulously examine existing scholarly works to gauge the prevalence, severity, and therapeutic approaches to postoperative complications arising from colorectal cancer surgeries.

Methods: Employing a systematic approach, this study reviewed 135 peer-reviewed publications from the period of 2000-2023. The corpus was organized into categories reflective of the postoperative complications discussed: anastomotic leakage, port-site metastases, small bowel adhesions and obstructions, thrombosis, ileus, postoperative infections, urinary dysfunctions, and cardiovascular dysfunctions. Advanced artificial intelligence tools were leveraged for in-depth literature searches and semantic analyses to pinpoint research lacunae.

Results: The analysis revealed that anastomotic leakage and postoperative infections garnered the majority of academic focus, representing 35% and 25% of the studies, respectively. Conversely, port-site metastases and cardiovascular dysfunctions were less frequently examined, accounting for merely 5% and 3% of the literature. The reviewed studies indicate a disparity in the reported prevalence rates of each complication, oscillating between 3% and 20%. Furthermore, the review identified a dearth of evidence-based management protocols, underscored by a pronounced heterogeneity in treatment guidelines.

Conclusions: The literature is replete with analyses on anastomotic leakage and postoperative infections; however, there exists a glaring scarcity of exhaustive research on other postoperative complications. This review emphasizes the pressing need for uniform treatment guidelines and spotlights areas in dire need of further research, aiming at the comprehensive enhancement of patient outcomes following colorectal cancer surgery.

Citing Articles

The Determinants of Long-Term Outcomes After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Literature Review.

Anifalaje O, Ojo C, Balogun O, Ayodele F, Azeez A, Gabriels S Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e74985.

PMID: 39744296 PMC: 11692687. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.74985.

References
1.
Morks A, Ploeg R, Hofker H, Wiggers T, Havenga K . Late anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a significant problem. Colorectal Dis. 2013; 15(5):e271-5. DOI: 10.1111/codi.12167. View

2.
Depalma N, Cassini D, Grieco M, Barbieri V, Altamura A, Manoochehri F . Feasibility of a tailored ERAS programme in octogenarian patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019; 32(2):265-273. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-019-01195-6. View

3.
Hyspler R, Ticha A, Kaska M, Zaloudkova L, Pliskova L, Havel E . Markers of Perioperative Bowel Complications in Colorectal Surgery Patients. Dis Markers. 2016; 2015:428535. PMC: 4693001. DOI: 10.1155/2015/428535. View

4.
Kelly K, Iannuzzi J, Aquina C, Probst C, Noyes K, Monson J . Timing of discharge: a key to understanding the reason for readmission after colorectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014; 19(3):418-27. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-014-2718-7. View

5.
Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View