» Articles » PMID: 39544406

Costs of Physician and Diagnostic Imaging Services for Shoulder, Knee, and Low Back Pain Conditions: A Population-based Study in Alberta, Canada

Overview
Journal Br J Pain
Date 2024 Nov 15
PMID 39544406
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To 1) estimate the utilization and costs of physician and diagnostic imaging (DI) services for shoulder, knee, and low-back pain (LBP) conditions; and 2) examine determinants of the utilization and costs of these services.

Methods: All patients visiting a physician for shoulder, knee, or LBP conditions (identified by the ICD-9 codes) in Alberta, Canada, in fiscal year (FY) 2022/2023 were included. Interested outcomes included numbers and costs of physician visits and DI exams stratified by condition, physician specialty, DI modality, and patients' sex and age. Multivariate regressions were used to examine determinants of the outcomes.

Results: In FY 2022/2023, 10.4%, 7.0%, and 6.7% of the population saw physicians for shoulder, knee, and LBP conditions, respectively. This costs Alberta $307.04 million ($67.93 per capita), of which shoulder accounted for 41%, knee 28%, and LBP 31%. In the same FY, 17,734 computed tomography (CT), 43,939 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 686 ultrasound (US), and 170,936 X-ray exams related to shoulder/knee/LBP conditions were ordered for these patients, costing another $29.07 million, of which CT accounted for 14%, MRI 48%, US 0%, and X-ray 37%. Female, older age, comorbidity scores, and capital zone used physician services more frequently. Patients with a higher comorbidity index scores or more physician visits were more likely being referred for CT or MRI.

Conclusion: Musculoskeletal conditions are common and result in patients seeking healthcare services. Visits to family physicians, specialists, and the ordering of DI contribute to extensive utilization of health services, contributing to considerable health system costs.

References
1.
Jinks C, Jordan K, Croft P . Measuring the population impact of knee pain and disability with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Pain. 2002; 100(1-2):55-64. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00239-7. View

2.
Power J, Perruccio A, DesMeules M, Lagace C, Badley E . Ambulatory physician care for musculoskeletal disorders in Canada. J Rheumatol. 2006; 33(1):133-9. View

3.
Grotle M, Hagen K, Natvig B, Dahl F, Kvien T . Prevalence and burden of osteoarthritis: results from a population survey in Norway. J Rheumatol. 2008; 35(4):677-84. View

4.
Linsell L, Dawson J, Zondervan K, Rose P, Randall T, Fitzpatrick R . Prevalence and incidence of adults consulting for shoulder conditions in UK primary care; patterns of diagnosis and referral. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005; 45(2):215-21. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kei139. View

5.
Quan H, Li B, Couris C, Fushimi K, Graham P, Hider P . Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol. 2011; 173(6):676-82. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq433. View