Accounting for Heterogeneity Due to Environmental Sources in Meta-analysis of Genome-wide Association Studies

Overview

Journal Commun Biol

Specialty Biology

Date 2024 Nov 14

PMID 39543362

Authors

Siru Wang

Oyesola O Ojewunmi

Abram Kamiza

Michele Ramsay

Andrew P Morris

Tinashe Chikowore

Segun Fatumo

Jennifer L Asimit

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) across diverse populations offers power gains to identify loci associated with complex traits and diseases. Often heterogeneity in effect sizes across populations will be correlated with genetic ancestry and environmental exposures (e.g. lifestyle factors). We present an environment-adjusted meta-regression model (env-MR-MEGA) to detect genetic associations by adjusting for and quantifying environmental and ancestral heterogeneity between populations. In simulations, env-MR-MEGA has similar or greater association power than MR-MEGA, with notable gains when the environmental factor has a greater correlation with the trait than ancestry. In our analysis of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in ~19,000 individuals across twelve sex-stratified GWAS from Africa, adjusting for sex, BMI, and urban status, we identify additional heterogeneity beyond ancestral effects for seven variants. Env-MR-MEGA provides an approach to account for environmental effects using summary-level data, making it a useful tool for meta-analyses without the need to share individual-level data.

Citing Articles

Navigating Mendelian Randomization in Sleep Medicine: Challenges, Opportunities, and Best Practices.

BaHammam A, Jahrami H Nat Sci Sleep. 2024; 16:1811-1825.

PMID: 39600493 PMC: 11590675. DOI: 10.2147/NSS.S495411.

References

de Leeuw C, Mooij J, Heskes T, Posthuma D . MAGMA: generalized gene-set analysis of GWAS data. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015; 11(4):e1004219. PMC: 4401657. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004219. View

Rosenberg N, Huang L, Jewett E, Szpiech Z, Jankovic I, Boehnke M . Genome-wide association studies in diverse populations. Nat Rev Genet. 2010; 11(5):356-66. PMC: 3079573. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2760. View

Heid I, Jackson A, Randall J, Winkler T, Qi L, Steinthorsdottir V . Meta-analysis identifies 13 new loci associated with waist-hip ratio and reveals sexual dimorphism in the genetic basis of fat distribution. Nat Genet. 2010; 42(11):949-60. PMC: 3000924. DOI: 10.1038/ng.685. View

McMahon F, Akula N, Schulze T, Muglia P, Tozzi F, Detera-Wadleigh S . Meta-analysis of genome-wide association data identifies a risk locus for major mood disorders on 3p21.1. Nat Genet. 2010; 42(2):128-31. PMC: 2854040. DOI: 10.1038/ng.523. View

Yang J, Lee S, Goddard M, Visscher P . GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 2010; 88(1):76-82. PMC: 3014363. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.011. View

Graham S, Clarke S, Wu K, Kanoni S, Zajac G, Ramdas S . The power of genetic diversity in genome-wide association studies of lipids. Nature. 2021; 600(7890):675-679. PMC: 8730582. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-04064-3. View

Hirschhorn J, Daly M . Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits. Nat Rev Genet. 2005; 6(2):95-108. DOI: 10.1038/nrg1521. View

Magi R, Morris A . GWAMA: software for genome-wide association meta-analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010; 11:288. PMC: 2893603. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-288. View

Manolio T, Collins F, Cox N, Goldstein D, Hindorff L, Hunter D . Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature. 2009; 461(7265):747-53. PMC: 2831613. DOI: 10.1038/nature08494. View

10.

Fatumo S, Chikowore T, Kalyesubula R, Nsubuga R, Asiki G, Nashiru O . Discovery and fine-mapping of kidney function loci in first genome-wide association study in Africans. Hum Mol Genet. 2021; 30(16):1559-1568. PMC: 8330895. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddab088. View

11.

Ioannidis J, Patsopoulos N, Evangelou E . Uncertainty in heterogeneity estimates in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2007; 335(7626):914-6. PMC: 2048840. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39343.408449.80. View

12.

Teo Y, Ong R, Sim X, Tai E, Chia K . Identifying candidate causal variants via trans-population fine-mapping. Genet Epidemiol. 2010; 34(7):653-64. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20522. View

13.

Mantel N, Haenszel W . Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959; 22(4):719-48. View

14.

DerSimonian R, Laird N . Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7(3):177-88. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2. View

15.

Ali S, Soo C, Agongo G, Alberts M, Amenga-Etego L, Boua R . Genomic and environmental risk factors for cardiometabolic diseases in Africa: methods used for Phase 1 of the AWI-Gen population cross-sectional study. Glob Health Action. 2018; 11(sup2):1507133. PMC: 6161608. DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2018.1507133. View

16.

Hird T, Young E, Pirie F, Riha J, Esterhuizen T, OLeary B . Study profile: the Durban Diabetes Study (DDS): a platform for chronic disease research. Glob Health Epidemiol Genom. 2017; 1:e2. PMC: 5732575. DOI: 10.1017/gheg.2015.3. View

17.

Sugiuchi H, Irie T, Uji Y, Ueno T, Chaen T, Uekama K . Homogeneous assay for measuring low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in serum with triblock copolymer and alpha-cyclodextrin sulfate. Clin Chem. 1998; 44(3):522-31. View

18.

Han B, Eskin E . Random-effects model aimed at discovering associations in meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2011; 88(5):586-98. PMC: 3146723. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.04.014. View

19.

Laville V, Majarian T, Sung Y, Schwander K, Feitosa M, Chasman D . Gene-lifestyle interactions in the genomics of human complex traits. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022; 30(6):730-739. PMC: 9178041. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01045-6. View

20.

Stephens M, Balding D . Bayesian statistical methods for genetic association studies. Nat Rev Genet. 2009; 10(10):681-90. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2615. View