» Articles » PMID: 39539409

Memory Benefits of Daily-living-related Contextual Cueing for Individuals with Subjective Cognitive Decline and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Overview
Date 2024 Nov 14
PMID 39539409
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We aimed to assess how daily-living-related contextual cueing (DLCC) affects memory performance in three groups: healthy older adults (HA), those with subjective cognitive decline (SCD), and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), while accounting for age and education.

Methods: After gathering demographic information, participants underwent neuropsychological assessments including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog-12), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), and Trail Making Test (TMT) to establish baseline characteristics. Participants were categorized into HA ( = 47), SCD ( = 54), and MCI ( = 43) groups based on MoCA and ECog-12 scores. Memory performance was evaluated through two components of the Contextual Memory Test (CMT): one with non-contextual cues and the other with daily-living-related contextual cues.

Results: Interaction effects between contextual cueing and group for immediate recall ( < .001), delayed recall ( < .001), and total recall ( < .001) were found. All recall scores were lower in the MCI group than in the other two groups in the contextual cueing, not non-contextual. The post-hoc results revealed that scores on immediate recall, delayed recall, and total recall were lower in the MCI group than in the other two groups in the contextual cueing condition but not in the non-contextual cueing one.

Conclusions: Daily-living-related contextual cueing benefited HA, SCD, and younger-adult MCI groups more than older-adult MCI group, particularly enhancing delayed and total memory performance.

References
1.
Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P . "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12(3):189-98. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. View

2.
Chi S, Chua E, Kieschnick D, Rabin L . Retrospective metamemory monitoring of semantic memory in community-dwelling older adults with subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020; 32(3):429-463. PMC: 8071835. DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1831552. View

3.
Levy-Gigi E, Kelemen O, Gluck M, Keri S . Impaired context reversal learning, but not cue reversal learning, in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia. 2011; 49(12):3320-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.08.005. View

4.
Robin J, Moscovitch M . The effects of spatial contextual familiarity on remembered scenes, episodic memories, and imagined future events. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013; 40(2):459-75. DOI: 10.1037/a0034886. View

5.
Shapiro A, Levy-Gigi E . Susceptibility to retroactive interference: The effect of context as a function of age and cognition. Memory. 2015; 24(3):399-408. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1011168. View