» Articles » PMID: 39537722

Passive Shoulder Occupational Exoskeleton Reduces Shoulder Muscle Coactivation in Repetitive Arm Movements

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Nov 13
PMID 39537722
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Humans naturally employ muscle coactivation to facilitate a broad range of movements, enhancing joint stability and movement accuracy. However, excessive muscle coactivation can become unfavorable or even detrimental. This phenomenon is often observed in industrial workers who endure repetitive or prolonged joint stress, particularly in areas such as the shoulders. Prolonged stress can result in soft tissue damage and the onset of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). In recent years, there have been efforts to mitigate the emergence of work-related MSDs among industrial workers through the implementation of upper-limb occupational exoskeletons (OEs). While previous research has demonstrated their effectiveness in reducing shoulder muscle activation, particularly in static and overhead work activities, there has been a lack of studies examining the impact of upper-limb OEs on muscle coactivation during repetitive arm movements. To bridge this gap in knowledge, our study systematically assesses the influence of a passive exoskeleton's anti-gravitational support on shoulder muscle coactivation during repetitive arm movements. Results show that peak and mean coactivation levels linearly decrease with the increase of the amount of anti-gravitational support provided by the upper-limb OE, reaching approximately 51% and 54%, respectively. Conversely, the percentage of the movement cycle corresponding to the coactivation peak appears unaffected by the level of assistance. This study marks the first instance in which a passive upper-limb OE has been shown to reduce shoulder muscle coactivations, potentially paving the way for a novel methodology in their evaluation.

References
1.
Leong H, Fu S, He X, Oh J, Yamamoto N, Hang S . Risk factors for rotator cuff tendinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med. 2019; 51(9):627-637. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2598. View

2.
Pacifico I, Parri A, Taglione S, Sabatini A, Violante F, Molteni F . Exoskeletons for workers: A case series study in an enclosures production line. Appl Ergon. 2022; 101:103679. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103679. View

3.
Ranavolo A, Mari S, Conte C, Serrao M, Silvetti A, Iavicoli S . A new muscle co-activation index for biomechanical load evaluation in work activities. Ergonomics. 2015; 58(6):966-79. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2014.991764. View

4.
Crea S, Beckerle P, De Looze M, De Pauw K, Grazi L, Kermavnar T . Occupational exoskeletons: A roadmap toward large-scale adoption. Methodology and challenges of bringing exoskeletons to workplaces. Wearable Technol. 2024; 2:e11. PMC: 10936259. DOI: 10.1017/wtc.2021.11. View

5.
Rampichini S, Vieira T, Castiglioni P, Merati G . Complexity Analysis of Surface Electromyography for Assessing the Myoelectric Manifestation of Muscle Fatigue: A Review. Entropy (Basel). 2020; 22(5). PMC: 7517022. DOI: 10.3390/e22050529. View