» Articles » PMID: 39535125

Grief-Specific Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Vs Present-Centered Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal JAMA Psychiatry
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2024 Nov 13
PMID 39535125
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Prolonged grief disorder (PGD) is included as a new diagnosis in international classification systems. Treatments following a cognitive behavioral model are most effective, but comparisons with active control treatments are scarce.

Objective: To examine whether integrative cognitive behavioral therapy for prolonged grief (PG-CBT) is superior to present-centered therapy (PCT).

Design, Setting, And Participants: This was a rater-blinded, multicenter, randomized clinical trial (stratified by center and relationship to the deceased) with enrollment from April 2017 to May 2022. The setting included 4 university outpatient clinics in Germany. Eligible participants were aged 18 to 75 years and had PGD based on the Prolonged Grief Disorder 13 (PG-13) interview. Participants were randomized 1:1 to PG-CBT and PCT.

Interventions: PG-CBT focused on the exposure to the worst moment of the loss and cognitive restructuring of grief-related cognitions in combination with solution-focused and experiential methods (eg, walk to the grave exercise). PCT was adapted in session length and number to PG-CBT and focused on a supportive relationship and coping with daily problems that may have arisen from the loss or grief symptoms.

Main Outcomes And Measures: All outcomes were assessed at baseline, after treatment, and 12 months after randomization at follow-up. The primary outcome was a blinded assessment of the PG-13 severity score at follow-up. Secondary outcomes were self-reported depressive, somatic, and overall psychopathological symptoms.

Results: Of 544 treatment-seeking individuals experiencing bereavement, 212 eligible participants (mean [SD] age, 51.8 [13.3] years; 173 female [82%]) with PGD based on the PG-13 interview were randomized to PG-CBT and PCT (n = 106 in each condition). In the intention-to-treat analysis, both treatments yielded high reductions in PGD severity at follow-up (PG-CBT: Cohen d = 1.64; 95% CI, 1.31-1.97; PCT: Cohen d = 1.38; 95% CI, 1.09-1.66). After treatment, participants receiving PG-CBT demonstrated significantly greater reductions in PGD severity than those receiving PCT (Cohen d = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.03-0.57). At follow-up, this effect was only visible on a trend level (Cohen d = 0.28; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.57), whereas participants in the PG-CBT group had significantly less depressive and general psychopathological symptoms. Twenty-three participants (20%) discontinued PG-CBT treatment, and 17 participants (16%) discontinued PCT.

Conclusion And Relevance: This randomized clinical trial demonstrates that PG-CBT was superior to PCT after treatment and at follow-up with regard to comorbid symptoms. Both treatments were shown to be effective and acceptable, showing the potential for dissemination and increasing patient choice.

Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) identifier: DRKS00012317.

References
1.
Rosner R, Pfoh G, Kotoucova M, Hagl M . Efficacy of an outpatient treatment for prolonged grief disorder: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Affect Disord. 2014; 167:56-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.05.035. View

2.
Glickman K, Shear M, Wall M . Mediators of Outcome in Complicated Grief Treatment. J Clin Psychol. 2016; 73(7):817-828. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.22384. View

3.
Mallinckrodt C, Clark W, David S . Accounting for dropout bias using mixed-effects models. J Biopharm Stat. 2001; 11(1-2):9-21. DOI: 10.1081/BIP-100104194. View

4.
Latham A, Prigerson H . Suicidality and bereavement: complicated grief as psychiatric disorder presenting greatest risk for suicidality. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2004; 34(4):350-62. PMC: 1459278. DOI: 10.1521/suli.34.4.350.53737. View

5.
Boelen P, de Keijser J, van den Hout M, van den Bout J . Treatment of complicated grief: a comparison between cognitive-behavioral therapy and supportive counseling. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007; 75(2):277-84. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.2.277. View