Axial Rotation Affects the Cognitive Characteristics of Spatial Ability

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2024 Nov 13

PMID 39534476

Authors

Tian Feng

Fuchun Zhang

Jinzhao Liu

Manqi Liang

Yawei Li

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: To test spatial ability in athletes with different axial rotation experience and analyze their behavioral data to explain the cognitive mechanisms of spatial ability in athletes.

Methods: Experiment 1: A total of 147 athletes were selected for the paper-and-pencil mental rotation test (MRT). The athletes were separated according to three sport types: open high-spatial (OH) sport, closed high-spatial (CH) sport, closed low-spatial (CL) sport. Spatial ability testing with a two-factor mixed experimental design of 3 (sport type) × 2 (stimulus type). Experiment 2: In this study, 47 players were selected for computerized mental rotation test, with a three-factor mixed experimental design of 3 (sport type) × 2 (angle: 45°, 90°) × 3 (rotational axis: left-right axis, up-down axis, and front-back axis). Repeated-measures ANOVA was performed to evaluate the data.

Results: (1) The CH group and OH group outperformed the CL group in the non-embodied task (all s < 0.003) and the CH group was better than the other groups in the embodied and tasks (all s < 0.008). (2) Under 45° rotational conditions, the reaction time (RT) for the left-right (LR) and up-down (UD) axes were shorter than that for the front-back (FB) axis (all s < 0.026). However, under 90° conditions, the RT for FB < LR < UD, with superior accuracy and rotational speed for the FB axis than for the LR and UD axes (all s < 0.034). (3) Male players from the CH and CL groups had shorter RTs than did those from the OH group at both angles (all s < 0.047). For female players, the CH group presented a shorter RT than the OH and CL groups did at 90° (all s < 0.006). (4) No sex difference was found for paper and pencil MRTs, but a male advantage existed only in the CL group for computerized MRTs ( = 0.005).

Conclusion: The motor skills associated with axial rotation could promote mental rotation performance and compensate for sex differences in mental rotation ability.

References

Bauer R, Jost L, Gunther B, Jansen P . Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive load in mental rotation tasks with abstract and embodied figures. Psychol Res. 2021; 86(5):1382-1396. PMC: 9177492. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01568-5. View

Peters M, Manning J, Reimers S . The effects of sex, sexual orientation, and digit ratio (2D:4D) on mental rotation performance. Arch Sex Behav. 2007; 36(2):251-60. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-006-9166-8. View

Fargier P, Champely S, Massarelli R, Ammary L, Hoyek N . Modelling response time in a mental rotation task by gender, physical activity, and task features. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):15559. PMC: 9481519. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19054-2. View

Vandenberg S, Kuse A . Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Percept Mot Skills. 1978; 47(2):599-604. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599. View

Morawietz C, Muehlbauer T . Effects of Physical Exercise Interventions on Spatial Orientation in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Scoping Review. Front Sports Act Living. 2021; 3:664640. PMC: 8247469. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2021.664640. View

Hegarty M . Ability and sex differences in spatial thinking: What does the mental rotation test really measure?. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017; 25(3):1212-1219. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1347-z. View

Wilson M . Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon Bull Rev. 2003; 9(4):625-36. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196322. View

Habacha H, Molinaro C, Tabben M, Lejeune-Poutrain L . Implementation of specific motor expertise during a mental rotation task of hands. Exp Brain Res. 2014; 232(11):3465-73. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-4029-3. View

Corballis M . Recognition of disoriented shapes. Psychol Rev. 1988; 95(1):115-23. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.95.1.115. View

10.

Heil M, Rolke B . Toward a chronopsychophysiology of mental rotation. Psychophysiology. 2002; 39(4):414-22. DOI: 10.1017.S0048577202001105. View

11.

Feng T, Zhang Z, Ji Z, Jia B, Li Y . Selective Effects of Sport Expertise on the Stages of Mental Rotation Tasks With Object-Based and Egocentric Transformations. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2017; 13(3):248-256. PMC: 5647158. DOI: 10.5709/acp-0225-x. View

12.

Voyer D, Jansen P . Motor expertise and performance in spatial tasks: A meta-analysis. Hum Mov Sci. 2017; 54:110-124. DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.04.004. View

13.

Habacha H, Lejeune-Poutrain L, Margas N, Molinaro C . Effects of the axis of rotation and primordially solicited limb of high level athletes in a mental rotation task. Hum Mov Sci. 2014; 37:58-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.06.002. View

14.

Kaltner S, Riecke B, Jansen P . Embodied mental rotation: a special link between egocentric transformation and the bodily self. Front Psychol. 2014; 5:505. PMC: 4042493. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00505. View

15.

Wohlschlager A . Mental and manual rotation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998; 24(2):397-412. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.2.397. View

16.

Tsigeman E, Likhanov M, Budakova A, Akmalov A, Sabitov I, Alenina E . Persistent gender differences in spatial ability, even in STEM experts. Heliyon. 2023; 9(4):e15247. PMC: 10123158. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15247. View

17.

Debarnot U, Piolino P, Baron J, Guillot A . Mental rotation: effects of gender, training and sleep consolidation. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3):e60296. PMC: 3609807. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060296. View

18.

Gallese V, Sinigaglia C . What is so special about embodied simulation?. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011; 15(11):512-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.09.003. View

19.

Jansen P, Lehmann J . Mental rotation performance in soccer players and gymnasts in an object-based mental rotation task. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2013; 9(2):92-8. PMC: 3700661. DOI: 10.2478/v10053-008-0135-8. View

20.

Alexander G, Evardone M . Blocks and bodies: sex differences in a novel version of the Mental Rotations Test. Horm Behav. 2007; 53(1):177-84. PMC: 2683583. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.09.014. View