Analysis of the Quality of Information Provided by "Dr. YouTube™" on Premature Ejaculation

Overview

Journal Ind Psychiatry J

Date 2024 Nov 13

PMID 39534145

Authors

Swarndeep Singh

Bastabika Neupane

Omkar Dhungel

Pawan Sharma

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: YouTube is an important online resource to access health-related online information by the public worldwide. However, the quality of information available on it has not been adequately characterized.

Aim: To assess the quality and reliability of information available on the treatment of premature ejaculation (PME) on YouTube in the Hindi and English language videos.

Materials And Methods: A total of 151 (Hindi: 109, English: 42) YouTube videos were selected for assessment. The quality was evaluated using structured tools: Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT); and a 5-point modified DISCERN questionnaire (Range: 1-serious shortcomings; 5-minimal shortcomings). PEMAT assesses the understandability and actionability of video as separate percentages.

Results: Three most common treatments suggested for PME were Kegel exercise (22.5%), start-stop technique (21.9%), and antidepressant medications (20.5%). Antidepressant medications, stop-squeeze techniques, and psychotherapy were more frequently suggested in English videos, whereas ayurvedic or herbal medicines were more frequently suggested in Hindi videos. About two-thirds of videos presented information in an easy-to-understand and actionable manner (PEMAT scores ≥70%). Only 6% of videos had a DISCERN score of ≥4, indicating good overall quality of information presented in them.

Conclusion: People likely to encounter poor-quality information when seeking information for PME treatment on YouTube. A large number of videos suggested ineffective or unproven treatment strategies for PME. Healthcare professionals need to be mindful of this while counselling patients, and guide them regarding useful and reliable sources of health information available online.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the Effect of Video Source and Other Video Characteristics on the Quality, Reliability, Actionability, and Understandability of Videos on Acromioclavicular Joint Repair.

Chandasir A, Skariah J, Abes J, Patel A, Lomis M, Chandasir N Cureus. 2025; 17(2):e78518.

PMID: 40062026 PMC: 11885064. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.78518.

References

Verze P, Arcaniolo D, Imbimbo C, Cai T, Venturino L, Spirito L . General and sex profile of women with partner affected by premature ejaculation: results of a large observational, non-interventional, cross-sectional, epidemiological study (IPER-F). Andrology. 2018; 6(5):714-719. DOI: 10.1111/andr.12545. View

Pattenden T, Raleigh R, Pattenden E, Thangasamy I . Quality and readability of online patient information on treatment for erectile dysfunction. BJUI Compass. 2022; 2(6):412-418. PMC: 8988690. DOI: 10.1002/bco2.87. View

Shindel A, Althof S, Carrier S, Chou R, McMahon C, Mulhall J . Disorders of Ejaculation: An AUA/SMSNA Guideline. J Urol. 2021; 207(3):504-512. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002392. View

Kaynak Y, Kaya C, Aykac A . YouTube as a source of premature ejaculation. Rev Int Androl. 2019; 18(2):63-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.androl.2018.12.002. View

Daraz L, Morrow A, Ponce O, Farah W, Katabi A, Majzoub A . Readability of Online Health Information: A Meta-Narrative Systematic Review. Am J Med Qual. 2018; 33(5):487-492. DOI: 10.1177/1062860617751639. View

Li H, Gao P, Gao J, Wu X, Liu G, Dai Y . Risk factors of premature ejaculation and its influence on sexual function of spouse. Basic Clin Androl. 2021; 31(1):5. PMC: 7890845. DOI: 10.1186/s12610-020-00120-6. View

Silberg W, LUNDBERG G, Musacchio R . Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997; 277(15):1244-5. View

Porst H, Montorsi F, Rosen R, Gaynor L, Grupe S, Alexander J . The Premature Ejaculation Prevalence and Attitudes (PEPA) survey: prevalence, comorbidities, and professional help-seeking. Eur Urol. 2006; 51(3):816-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.07.004. View

Cetin A . Evaluation of YouTube Video Content Related to the Management of Hypoglycemia. Cureus. 2021; 13(1):e12525. PMC: 7863569. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.12525. View

10.

Shoemaker S, Wolf M, Brach C . Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): a new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information. Patient Educ Couns. 2014; 96(3):395-403. PMC: 5085258. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.027. View

11.

Avasthi A, Grover S, Rao T . Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sexual Dysfunction. Indian J Psychiatry. 2017; 59(Suppl 1):S91-S115. PMC: 5310110. DOI: 10.4103/0019-5545.196977. View

12.

Irfan M, Hussain N, Mohd Noor N, Mohamed M, Sidi H, Ismail S . Epidemiology of Male Sexual Dysfunction in Asian and European Regions: A Systematic Review. Am J Mens Health. 2020; 14(4):1557988320937200. PMC: 7338652. DOI: 10.1177/1557988320937200. View

13.

Gul M, Diri M . YouTube as a Source of Information About Premature Ejaculation Treatment. J Sex Med. 2019; 16(11):1734-1740. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.08.008. View

14.

Fode M, Nolsoe A, Jacobsen F, Russo G, Ostergren P, Jensen C . Quality of Information in YouTube Videos on Erectile Dysfunction. Sex Med. 2020; 8(3):408-413. PMC: 7471071. DOI: 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.05.007. View