» Articles » PMID: 39533110

Automated Hematoma Detection and Outcome Prediction in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Pharmacology
Date 2024 Nov 12
PMID 39533110
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To develop a tool for automated subtype classification and segmentation of intracranial hemorrhages (ICH) on CT scans of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Furthermore, outcome prediction for patients can effectively facilitate patient management.

Methods: This study presents a cascade framework for two-stage segmentation and multi-label classification. The hematoma region of interest (ROI) is localized, and then the ROI is cropped and resized to the original pixel size before being input into the model again to obtain the segmentation results. In multilabel classification, the mask obtained from automatic segmentation is superimposed onto the corresponding ROI and CT slices, respectively, to constitute the input image. Subsequently, the ROI image is employed as the local network input to obtain local features. Third, the CT image is utilized to construct a feature extraction network to obtain global features. Ultimately, the local and global features are fused dimensions in the pooling layer, and calculated to generate the final retrieval results. For the prediction of 14-day in-hospital mortality, automatically extracted hematoma subtype and volume features were integrated to enhance the widely used CRASH model.

Results: The proposed segmentation method achieves the best estimates on the Dice similarity coefficient and Jaccard Similarity Index. The proposed multilabel classification method achieved an average accuracy of 95.91%. For mortality prediction, the best model achieved an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.91 by 5-fold cross-validation.

Conclusions: The proposed method enhances the precision of hematoma segmentation and subtype classification. In clinical settings, the method can streamline the evaluation of ICH for radiologists, and the automatically extracted features are anticipated to facilitate prognosis assessment.

References
1.
Wang K, Yang Z, Zhu T, Shi Y, Rubenstein R, Tyndall J . An update on diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for traumatic brain injury. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2018; 18(2):165-180. PMC: 6359936. DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2018.1428089. View

2.
Angkurawaranon S, Sanorsieng N, Unsrisong K, Inkeaw P, Sripan P, Khumrin P . A comparison of performance between a deep learning model with residents for localization and classification of intracranial hemorrhage. Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):9975. PMC: 10282020. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37114-z. View

3.
Wiles M, Braganza M, Edwards H, Krause E, Jackson J, Tait F . Management of traumatic brain injury in the non-neurosurgical intensive care unit: a narrative review of current evidence. Anaesthesia. 2023; 78(4):510-520. DOI: 10.1111/anae.15898. View

4.
Muehlschlegel S, Rajajee V, Wartenberg K, Alexander S, Busl K, Creutzfeldt C . Guidelines for Neuroprognostication in Critically Ill Adults with Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurocrit Care. 2024; 40(2):448-476. PMC: 10959796. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-023-01902-2. View

5.
Mangat H, Wu X, Gerber L, Shabani H, Lazaro A, Leidinger A . Severe traumatic brain injury management in Tanzania: analysis of a prospective cohort. J Neurosurg. 2021; 135(4):1190-1202. PMC: 8295409. DOI: 10.3171/2020.8.JNS201243. View