» Articles » PMID: 39532911

Preferable Effect of CTLA4-Ig on Both Bone Erosion and Bone Microarchitecture in Rheumatoid Arthritis Revealed by HR-pQCT

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Nov 12
PMID 39532911
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This exploratory study aimed to examine the impact of abatacept treatment on bone structure in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). RA patients initiating either abatacept or newly introduced csDMARDs were enrolled in this prospective, non-randomized, two-group study. Bone structure in the 2nd and 3rd metacarpal heads was assessed using HR-pQCT at 0, 6, and 12 months after enrollment. Synovitis was evaluated using musculoskeletal ultrasound and MRI. The adjusted mean between-group differences (abatacept-csDMARDs group) were estimated using a mixed-effect model. Thirty-five patients (abatacept group: n = 15; csDMARDs group: n = 20) were analyzed. Changes in erosion volume, depth and width were numerically smaller in the abatacept group compared to the csDMARDs group (adjusted mean between-group differences: - 1.86 mm, - 0.02 mm, and - 0.09 mm, respectively). Over a 12-month period, 5 erosions emerged in the csDMARDs group, while only 1 erosion appeared in the abatacept group. Compared to csDMARDs, abatacept better preserved bone microarchitecture; several components of bone microarchitecture were significantly worsened at 6 months in the csDMARDs group, but were not deteriorated at 6 months in the abatacept group. Changes in synovitis scores were similar between the two treatment groups. Our results indicate that abatacept prevented the progression of bone erosion including new occurrence, and also prevented worsening of bone strength independently with synovitis compared to csDMARDs including MTX. Thus, abatacept treatment may provide benefits not only in inhibiting the progress of bone erosion but also in preventing bone microarchitectural deterioration.

References
1.
Kaine J, Gladstein G, Strusberg I, Robles M, Louw I, Gujrathi S . Evaluation of abatacept administered subcutaneously in adults with active rheumatoid arthritis: impact of withdrawal and reintroduction on immunogenicity, efficacy and safety (phase Iiib ALLOW study). Ann Rheum Dis. 2011; 71(1):38-44. PMC: 3233696. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200344. View

2.
Roser-Page S, Vikulina T, Weiss D, Habib M, Beck Jr G, Pacifici R . CTLA-4Ig (abatacept) balances bone anabolic effects of T cells and Wnt-10b with antianabolic effects of osteoblastic sclerostin. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018; 1415(1):21-33. PMC: 5867252. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13643. View

3.
Wells A, Westhovens R, Reed D, Fanti L, Becker J, Covucci A . Abatacept plus methotrexate provides incremental clinical benefits versus methotrexate alone in methotrexate-naive patients with early rheumatoid arthritis who achieve radiographic nonprogression. J Rheumatol. 2011; 38(11):2362-8. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.110054. View

4.
Iwamoto N, Chiba K, Sato S, Shiraishi K, Watanabe K, Oki N . Inhibition of bone erosion, determined by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT), in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving a conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (csDMARD) plus denosumab vs.... Arthritis Res Ther. 2022; 24(1):264. PMC: 9727996. DOI: 10.1186/s13075-022-02957-w. View

5.
Hoff M, Haugeberg G, Kvien T . Hand bone loss as an outcome measure in established rheumatoid arthritis: 2-year observational study comparing cortical and total bone loss. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007; 9(4):R81. PMC: 2206380. DOI: 10.1186/ar2280. View