Molecular Level Insights on the Pulsed Electrochemical CO Reduction

Overview

Journal Nat Commun

Specialty Biology

Date 2024 Nov 12

PMID 39532852

Authors

Ke Ye

Tian-Wen Jiang

Hyun Dong Jung

Peng Shen

So Min Jang

Zhe Weng

Seoin Back

Wen-Bin Cai

Kun Jiang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Electrochemical CO reduction reaction (CORR) occurring at the electrode/electrolyte interface is sensitive to both the potential and concentration polarization. Compared to static electrolysis at a fixed potential, pulsed electrolysis with alternating anodic and cathodic potentials is an intriguing approach that not only reconstructs the surface structure, but also regulates the local pH and mass transport from the electrolyte side in the immediate vicinity of the cathode. Herein, via a combined online mass spectrometry investigation with sub-second temporal resolution and 1-dimensional diffusion profile simulations, we reveal that heightened surface CO concentration promotes CORR over H evolution for both polycrystalline Ag and Cu electrodes after anodic pulses. Moreover, mild oxidative pulses generate a roughened surface topology with under-coordinated Ag or Cu sites, delivering the best CO-to-CO and CO-to-C performance, respectively. Surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy elucidates the potential dependence of *CO and *OCHO species on Ag as well as the gradually improved *CO consumption rate over under-coordinated Cu after oxidative pulses, directly correlating apparent CORR selectivity with dynamic interfacial chemistry at the molecular level.

References

Fan L, Xia C, Yang F, Wang J, Wang H, Lu Y . Strategies in catalysts and electrolyzer design for electrochemical CO reduction toward C products. Sci Adv. 2020; 6(8):eaay3111. PMC: 7034982. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aay3111. View

Larsen A, Mortensen J, Blomqvist J, Castelli I, Christensen R, Dulak M . The atomic simulation environment-a Python library for working with atoms. J Phys Condens Matter. 2017; 29(27):273002. DOI: 10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e. View

Clark E, Bell A . Direct Observation of the Local Reaction Environment during the Electrochemical Reduction of CO. J Am Chem Soc. 2018; 140(22):7012-7020. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b04058. View

Xiao H, Goddard 3rd W, Cheng T, Liu Y . Cu metal embedded in oxidized matrix catalyst to promote CO activation and CO dimerization for electrochemical reduction of CO. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114(26):6685-6688. PMC: 5495255. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1702405114. View

Ma M, Trzesniewski B, Xie J, Smith W . Selective and Efficient Reduction of Carbon Dioxide to Carbon Monoxide on Oxide-Derived Nanostructured Silver Electrocatalysts. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2016; 55(33):9748-52. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201604654. View

Woldu A, Talebi P, Yohannes A, Xu J, Wu X, Siahrostami S . Insights into Electrochemical CO Reduction on SnS : Main Product Switch from Hydrogen to Formate by Pulsed Potential Electrolysis. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2023; 62(29):e202301621. DOI: 10.1002/anie.202301621. View

Li Z, Wang L, Wang T, Sun L, Yang W . Steering the Dynamics of Reaction Intermediates and Catalyst Surface during Electrochemical Pulsed CO Reduction for Enhanced C Selectivity. J Am Chem Soc. 2023; 145(37):20655-20664. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c08005. View

Zhang G, Tan B, Mok D, Liu H, Ni B, Zhao G . Electrifying HCOOH synthesis from CO building blocks over Cu-Bi nanorod arrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(29):e2400898121. PMC: 11260142. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2400898121. View

Grimme S, Ehrlich S, Goerigk L . Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. J Comput Chem. 2011; 32(7):1456-65. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21759. View

10.

Dunwell M, Lu Q, Heyes J, Rosen J, Chen J, Yan Y . The Central Role of Bicarbonate in the Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide on Gold. J Am Chem Soc. 2017; 139(10):3774-3783. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b13287. View

11.

Mathew K, Kolluru V, Mula S, Steinmann S, Hennig R . Implicit self-consistent electrolyte model in plane-wave density-functional theory. J Chem Phys. 2019; 151(23):234101. DOI: 10.1063/1.5132354. View

12.

Tao Z, Pearce A, Mayer J, Wang H . Bridge Sites of Au Surfaces Are Active for Electrocatalytic CO Reduction. J Am Chem Soc. 2022; 144(19):8641-8648. PMC: 9158392. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c01098. View

13.

Xu A, Govindarajan N, Kastlunger G, Vijay S, Chan K . Theories for Electrolyte Effects in CO Electroreduction. Acc Chem Res. 2022; 55(4):495-503. DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00679. View

14.

Liu W, Zhai P, Li A, Wei B, Si K, Wei Y . Electrochemical CO reduction to ethylene by ultrathin CuO nanoplate arrays. Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):1877. PMC: 8986799. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29428-9. View

15.

de Ruiter J, An H, Wu L, Gijsberg Z, Yang S, Hartman T . Probing the Dynamics of Low-Overpotential CO-to-CO Activation on Copper Electrodes with Time-Resolved Raman Spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc. 2022; 144(33):15047-15058. PMC: 9413204. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c03172. View

16.

Gao W, Xu Y, Xiong H, Chang X, Lu Q, Xu B . CO Binding Energy is an Incomplete Descriptor of Cu-Based Catalysts for the Electrochemical CO Reduction Reaction. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2023; 62(47):e202313798. DOI: 10.1002/anie.202313798. View

17.

Wang Y, Liu J, Zheng G . Designing Copper-Based Catalysts for Efficient Carbon Dioxide Electroreduction. Adv Mater. 2021; 33(46):e2005798. DOI: 10.1002/adma.202005798. View

18.

Wang G, Chen J, Ding Y, Cai P, Yi L, Li Y . Electrocatalysis for CO conversion: from fundamentals to value-added products. Chem Soc Rev. 2021; 50(8):4993-5061. DOI: 10.1039/d0cs00071j. View

19.

Jeon H, Timoshenko J, Rettenmaier C, Herzog A, Yoon A, Chee S . Selectivity Control of Cu Nanocrystals in a Gas-Fed Flow Cell through CO Pulsed Electroreduction. J Am Chem Soc. 2021; 143(19):7578-7587. PMC: 8154520. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c03443. View

20.

De Luna P, Hahn C, Higgins D, Jaffer S, Jaramillo T, Sargent E . What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes?. Science. 2019; 364(6438). DOI: 10.1126/science.aav3506. View