Influence of Implant Surfaces on Peri-Implant Diseases - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview

Journal Int Dent J

Publisher Elsevier

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2024 Nov 12

PMID 39532569

Authors

Ahmad Hussein

Maanas Shah

Momen A Atieh

Sara Alhimairi

Fatemeh Amir-Rad

Haitham Elbishari

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the current literature on the effect of implant surface characteristics on peri-implant marginal bone levels (MBL), soft tissue periodontal parameters, peri-implantitis, and implant failure rates.

Materials And Methods: Randomized controlled trials were searched in electronic databases. Risk of bias within the selected studies was assessed using the Risk of Bias Tool 2. Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager software for studies with similar comparisons reporting same outcome measures.

Results: Ten randomized control trials were included in the present review. The primary outcome of changes in peri-implant MBL favoured implants with machined surfaces, however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = .18). The changes in probing pocket depths significantly favoured the use of machined surfaces (P = .01), while the implant failure rates favoured roughened surface implants. However, the difference was not statistically significant (P = .09).

Conclusion: Machined surface implants were favoured in terms of lesser peri-implant MBL, though the difference was not significant. The analysis also demonstrated limited favourable outcomes in terms of periodontal parameters for machined surfaces, with slightly significantly better outcomes in terms of probing pocket depths. However, rough surface implants tended to display a lower implant failure.

References

Saulacic N, Schaller B . Prevalence of Peri-Implantitis in Implants with Turned and Rough Surfaces: a Systematic Review. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2019; 10(1):e1. PMC: 6498817. DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2019.10101. View

Milleret V, Lienemann P, Gasser A, Bauer S, Ehrbar M, Wennerberg A . Rational design and in vitro characterization of novel dental implant and abutment surfaces for balancing clinical and biological needs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019; 21 Suppl 1:15-24. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12736. View

Nicu E, Van Assche N, Coucke W, Teughels W, Quirynen M . RCT comparing implants with turned and anodically oxidized surfaces: a pilot study, a 3-year follow-up. J Clin Periodontol. 2012; 39(12):1183-90. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12022. View

Polizzi G, Gualini F, Friberg B . A two-center retrospective analysis of long-term clinical and radiologic data of TiUnite and turned implants placed in the same mouth. Int J Prosthodont. 2013; 26(4):350-8. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.3386. View

Roccuzzo M, Bonino F, Aglietta M, Dalmasso P . Ten-year results of a three arms prospective cohort study on implants in periodontally compromised patients. Part 2: clinical results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 23(4):389-95. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02309.x. View

Serrano B, Sanz-Sanchez I, Serrano K, Montero E, Sanz M . One-year outcomes of dental implants with a hybrid surface macro-design placed in patients with history of periodontitis: A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2021; 49(2):90-100. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13575. View

Furst M, Salvi G, Lang N, Persson G . Bacterial colonization immediately after installation on oral titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18(4):501-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01381.x. View

Dierens M, Vandeweghe S, Kisch J, Nilner K, De Bruyn H . Long-term follow-up of turned single implants placed in periodontally healthy patients after 16-22 years: radiographic and peri-implant outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 23(2):197-204. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02212.x. View

Wennstrom J, Ekestubbe A, Grondahl K, Karlsson S, Lindhe J . Oral rehabilitation with implant-supported fixed partial dentures in periodontitis-susceptible subjects. A 5-year prospective study. J Clin Periodontol. 2004; 31(9):713-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00568.x. View

10.

Derks J, Tomasi C . Peri-implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 42 Suppl 16:S158-71. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12334. View

11.

Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

12.

Pontoriero R, Tonelli M, Carnevale G, Mombelli A, Nyman S, Lang N . Experimentally induced peri-implant mucositis. A clinical study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994; 5(4):254-9. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050409.x. View

13.

Tirone F, Salzano S, Rodi D, Pozzatti L . Three-Year Evaluation of the Influence of Implant Surfaces on Implant Failure and Peri-implantitis: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial with Split-Mouth Design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021; 36(2):e23-e30. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.8538. View

14.

Branemark P, Adell R, Albrektsson T, Lekholm U, Lundkvist S, Rockler B . Osseointegrated titanium fixtures in the treatment of edentulousness. Biomaterials. 1983; 4(1):25-8. DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(83)90065-0. View

15.

Koodaryan R, Hafezeqoran A . Evaluation of Implant Collar Surfaces for Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016:4987526. PMC: 4963580. DOI: 10.1155/2016/4987526. View

16.

Camarda A, Durand R, Benkarim M, Rompre P, Guertin G, Ciaburro H . Prospective randomized clinical trial evaluating the effects of two different implant collar designs on peri-implant healing and functional osseointegration after 25 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020; 32(3):285-296. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13699. View

17.

Rocci A, Rocci M, Rocci C, Scoccia A, Gargari M, Martignoni M . Immediate loading of Brånemark system TiUnite and machined-surface implants in the posterior mandible, part II: a randomized open-ended 9-year follow-up clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28(3):891-5. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2397. View

18.

Ostman P, Chrcanovic B, Albrektsson T . A Prospective Report of the Clinical Outcome of TiUnite Implants at 20 Years of Follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2024; (3):389-395. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.10654. View

19.

Doornewaard R, Christiaens V, De Bruyn H, Jacobsson M, Cosyn J, Vervaeke S . Long-Term Effect of Surface Roughness and Patients' Factors on Crestal Bone Loss at Dental Implants. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016; 19(2):372-399. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12457. View

20.

Astrand P, Engquist B, Anzen B, Bergendal T, Hallman M, Karlsson U . A three-year follow-up report of a comparative study of ITI Dental Implants and Brånemark System implants in the treatment of the partially edentulous maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005; 6(3):130-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00213.x. View