» Articles » PMID: 39529911

Unraveling the Impact of Operational Parameters and Environmental Conditions on the Quality of Viable Bacterial Aerosols

Overview
Journal PNAS Nexus
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Nov 12
PMID 39529911
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Viable pathogen-laden droplets of consistent quality are essential for reliably assessing the protection offered by facemasks against airborne infections. We identified a significant gap in guidance within standardized tests for evaluating the filtration efficiencies of facemask materials using viable bacteria-laden aerosol droplets. An aerosol platform, built according to the American Society for Testing and Materials standard F2101-19, was used to validate and standardize facemask filtration test procedures. We utilized this platform to investigate the impact of varying five operating parameters, namely suspension media composition, relative humidity, pathogen concentration, and atomizer airflow and feed flow rates, on the aerosol quality of viable bacteria-laden aerosols. We achieved consistent generation of 1,700 to 3,000 viable bacteria-laden droplets sized between 2.7 and 3.3 µm under the following optimized test conditions: 1.5% w/v peptone water concentration, ≥80% relative humidity at 24 ± 2 °C, 1 × 10 CFU/mL bacterial concentration, 1.5 L/min atomizer airflow rate, and 170 μL/min feed flow rate. We also explored the consequence of deviating from these optimized test parameters on viable bacteria-laden aerosol quality. These results highlight the importance of controlling these parameters when studying airborne transmission and control.

Citing Articles

Protocol for bacterial filtration efficiency evaluations of facemask materials using viable bacteria-laden aerosol droplets.

Thirugnanasampanthar M, Kvitka E, Gomez M, Jackson K, Bayat F, Rhem R STAR Protoc. 2024; 6(1):103506.

PMID: 39708329 PMC: 11729654. DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2024.103506.

References
1.
Hill D, Vasquez P, Mellnik J, McKinley S, Vose A, Mu F . A biophysical basis for mucus solids concentration as a candidate biomarker for airways disease. PLoS One. 2014; 9(2):e87681. PMC: 3928107. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087681. View

2.
Crowder T, Rosati J, Schroeter J, Hickey A, Martonen T . Fundamental effects of particle morphology on lung delivery: predictions of Stokes' law and the particular relevance to dry powder inhaler formulation and development. Pharm Res. 2002; 19(3):239-45. DOI: 10.1023/a:1014426530935. View

3.
Rengasamy S, Shaffer R, Williams B, Smit S . A comparison of facemask and respirator filtration test methods. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2016; 14(2):92-103. PMC: 7157953. DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1225157. View

4.
Archer J, Walker J, Gregson F, Hardy D, Reid J . Drying Kinetics and Particle Formation from Dilute Colloidal Suspensions in Aerosol Droplets. Langmuir. 2020; 36(42):12481-12493. DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c01830. View

5.
Asadi S, Cappa C, Barreda S, Wexler A, Bouvier N, Ristenpart W . Efficacy of masks and face coverings in controlling outward aerosol particle emission from expiratory activities. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):15665. PMC: 7518250. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72798-7. View