» Articles » PMID: 39528937

Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Catheter‑related Bladder Discomfort, Postoperative Pain and Opioid Requirement in Complex Fusion Lumbar Spinal Surgery: a Randomized, Double Blind, Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal BMC Anesthesiol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2024 Nov 11
PMID 39528937
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) and pain commonly arises postoperatively in patients who undergo intra-operative urinary catheterization. The study aims to demonstrate the effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine to prevent CRBD and postoperative pain in complex lumbar spinal surgery.

Methods: Eighty male patients, aged 20-79 years, scheduled for elective fusion spine surgery at least two levels were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg followed by 2 mg/kg/h) (Group L) or a parallel volume of normal saline (Group C). The primary outcome was incidence of moderate to severe CRBD in a postanesthetic care unit (PACU) between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, 24-hour post operative opioid requirement, mild and moderate to severe CRBD at 1, 2, 6 and 24 h postoperatively, patient satisfaction on Global Perceived Effect Scale (GPES), and the adverse effects of lidocaine and surgical complications.

Results: Group L showed a significantly lower incidence of moderate-to-severe CRBD compared to Group C in the PACU (P = 0.002) and at 1 h postoperatively (P = 0.039). Additionally, Group L experienced a significantly lower average pain scores compared to Group C at all time points (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.001, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001 at 0, 1, 2, 6 and 24 h, respectively) and demonstrated a significantly reduced postoperative morphine requirement across all time intervals (P < 0.05). Group L also reported significantly higher satisfaction on GPES compared to group C (P < 0.001). No adverse outcome was observed in either group.

Conclusion: Intravenous lidocaine administration significantly reduced the incidence of moderate-to-severe CRBD at PACU and at 1 h postoperatively. Additionally, its use in complex spine surgery led to reductions in postoperative pain, opioid requirement, and improved patient satisfaction, without any observed side effects.

References
1.
Agarwal A, Yadav G, Gupta D, Singh P, Singh U . Evaluation of intra-operative tramadol for prevention of catheter-related bladder discomfort: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Br J Anaesth. 2008; 101(4):506-10. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aen217. View

2.
Nongnuang K, Limprasert N, Munjupong S . Can intravenous lidocaine definitely attenuate propofol requirement and improve outcomes among colonoscopic patients under intravenous sedation?: A double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022; 101(39):e30670. PMC: 9524969. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030670. View

3.
Kim D, Park J, Yu J, Lee S, Park S, Hwang J . Intravenous Lidocaine for the Prevention of Postoperative Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort in Male Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2019; 131(1):220-227. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004405. View

4.
Lauretti G . Mechanisms of analgesia of intravenous lidocaine. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2009; 58(3):280-6. DOI: 10.1590/s0034-70942008000300011. View

5.
Hollmann M, Ritter C, Henle P, de Klaver M, Kamatchi G, Durieux M . Inhibition of m3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors by local anaesthetics. Br J Pharmacol. 2001; 133(1):207-16. PMC: 1572757. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704040. View