» Articles » PMID: 39527259

Periprosthetic Seromas and A third Space Effect After High-dose Methotrexate

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Nov 11
PMID 39527259
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Besides surgery, chemotherapy including high-dose methotrexate is a mainstay of osteosarcoma treatment. Methotrexate is known to accumulate in tissues and cavities, so-called third spaces (e.g., periprosthetic seromas) leading to local toxicity and delayed elimination (third space effect). We compared the concentrations of methotrexate in serum and periprosthetic seromas to evaluate a potential toxic risk based on a third space effect.

Methods: In 45 osteosarcoma patients who were treated with endoprosthesis and high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) between 1991 and 2011 we retrospectively analyzed methotrexate concentrations in periprosthetic seromas and serum. Differences were assessed by means of the Wilcoxon test.

Results: A total of 112 periprosthetic seroma punctures were performed in 18 out of 45 patients. At 24 h the periprosthetic seroma concentrations were in median 14.86-fold (range 1.49-42.97-fold, p = 0.001), at 48 h in median 8.50-fold (range 1.36-52.56, p < 0.001) and at 72 h in median 2.66-fold (range 0.66-5.82, p = 0.015) of the corresponding serum concentrations. At 24 h highly toxic concentrations (≥ 20 μmol/l) were observed in 30% of all analyzed seromas (median 109.83 μmol/l, range 4.91-170.71 μmol/l). A significantly higher serum concentration (range 0.16-0.75 μmol/l, median 0.36 µmol/l) was found in patients with prior puncture than patients without puncture at 45 h after HDMTX.

Conclusion: Methotrexate concentrations of periprosthetic seromas are significantly higher than corresponding serum concentrations possibly contributing to a third space effect. To avoid severe adverse effects punctures of these effusions should be considered.

References
1.
Gorlick R, Janeway K, Lessnick S, Randall R, Marina N . Children's Oncology Group's 2013 blueprint for research: bone tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012; 60(6):1009-15. PMC: 4610028. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24429. View

2.
Mirabello L, Troisi R, Savage S . Osteosarcoma incidence and survival rates from 1973 to 2004: data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Cancer. 2009; 115(7):1531-43. PMC: 2813207. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24121. View

3.
Smeland S, Bielack S, Whelan J, Bernstein M, Hogendoorn P, Krailo M . Survival and prognosis with osteosarcoma: outcomes in more than 2000 patients in the EURAMOS-1 (European and American Osteosarcoma Study) cohort. Eur J Cancer. 2019; 109:36-50. PMC: 6506906. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.11.027. View

4.
Bielack S, Kempf-Bielack B, Delling G, Exner G, Flege S, Helmke K . Prognostic factors in high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk: an analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma study group protocols. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20(3):776-90. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.3.776. View

5.
Bieling P, Rehan N, Winkler P, Helmke K, Maas R, Fuchs N . Tumor size and prognosis in aggressively treated osteosarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 1996; 14(3):848-58. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.3.848. View