» Articles » PMID: 39525627

Estimating Demographic Parameters for Bearded Seals, , in Alaska Using Close-Kin Mark-Recapture Methods

Overview
Journal Evol Appl
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Nov 11
PMID 39525627
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Reliable estimates of population abundance and demographics are essential for managing harvested species. Ice-associated phocids, "ice seals," are a vital resource for subsistence-dependent coastal Native communities in western and northern Alaska, USA. In 2012, the Beringia distinct population segment of the bearded seal, , was listed as "threatened" under the US Endangered Species Act requiring greater scrutiny for management assessments. We sought to estimate requisite population parameters from harvested seals by using close-kin mark-recapture (CKMR) methods, the first such application for marine mammals. Samples from 1758 bearded seals harvested by Bering, Chukchi, and Beaufort Sea communities during 1998-2020 were genotyped, genetically sexed, and aged by tooth annuli. After rigorous quality control, kin relationships were established for 1484 seals including two parent-offspring pairs (POPs) and 25 potential second-order kin pairs. Most of the second-order kin were half-sibling pairs (HSPs), but four were potential grandparent-grandchild pairs (GGPs). There were no full sibling pairs, suggesting a lack of mate fidelity. Mitochondrial DNA analysis identified 17 potential HSPs as paternally related, providing substantial evidence of persistent heterogeneity in reproductive success among adult males. The statistical CKMR model incorporates probabilities associated with POPs, HSPs, and GGPs and assumes known ages and a stable population. Our top model accommodates heterogeneity in adult male breeding success and yields an abundance estimate of ~409,000 with a coefficient of variation (CV) = 0.35, which is substantially greater than the "non-heterogeneity" model estimate of ~232,000 (CV = 0.21), an important difference for managing a harvested species. Using CKMR methods with harvested species provides estimates of abundance with the added opportunity to acquire information about adult survival, fecundity, and breeding success that could be applied to other species of concern, marine and terrestrial.

References
1.
Merriell B, Manseau M, Wilson P . Assessing the suitability of a one-time sampling event for close-kin mark-recapture: A caribou case study. Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(9):e70230. PMC: 11371883. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70230. View

2.
Jaccoud D, Peng K, Feinstein D, Kilian A . Diversity arrays: a solid state technology for sequence information independent genotyping. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29(4):E25. PMC: 29632. DOI: 10.1093/nar/29.4.e25. View

3.
Trukhanova I, Conn P, Boveng P . Taxonomy-based hierarchical analysis of natural mortality: polar and subpolar phocid seals. Ecol Evol. 2018; 8(21):10530-10541. PMC: 6238133. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4522. View

4.
Grewe P, Feutry P, Hill P, Gunasekera R, Schaefer K, Itano D . Evidence of discrete yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) populations demands rethink of management for this globally important resource. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:16916. PMC: 4655351. DOI: 10.1038/srep16916. View

5.
Ramstetter M, Dyer T, Lehman D, Curran J, Duggirala R, Blangero J . Benchmarking Relatedness Inference Methods with Genome-Wide Data from Thousands of Relatives. Genetics. 2017; 207(1):75-82. PMC: 5586387. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.117.1122. View