Non-invasive Assessment of Intracranial Pressure Through the Eyes: Current Developments, Limitations, and Future Directions

Overview

Journal Front Neurol

Specialty Neurology

Date 2024 Nov 11

PMID 39524910

Authors

Solmaz Bastani Viarsagh

Ashish Agar

Mitchell Lawlor

Clare Fraser

Mojtaba Golzan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Detecting and monitoring elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) is crucial in managing various neurologic and neuro-ophthalmic conditions, where early detection is essential to prevent complications such as seizures and stroke. Although traditional methods such as lumbar puncture, intraparenchymal and intraventricular cannulation, and external ventricular drainage are effective, they are invasive and carry risks of infection and brain hemorrhage. This has prompted the development of non-invasive techniques. Given that direct, non-invasive access to the brain is limited, a significant portion of research has focused on utilizing the eyes, which uniquely provide direct access to their internal structure and offer a cost-effective tool for non-invasive ICP assessment. This review explores the existing non-invasive ocular techniques for assessing chronically elevated ICP. Additionally, to provide a comprehensive perspective on the current landscape, invasive techniques are also examined. The discussion extends to the limitations inherent to each technique and the prospective pathways for future advancements in the field.

References

Agid R, Farb R, Willinsky R, Mikulis D, Tomlinson G . Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: the validity of cross-sectional neuroimaging signs. Neuroradiology. 2006; 48(8):521-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-006-0095-y. View

Verplanck M, Kaufman D, Parsons T, Yedavally S, Kokinakis D . Electrophysiology versus psychophysics in the detection of visual loss in pseudotumor cerebri. Neurology. 1988; 38(11):1789-92. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.38.11.1789. View

Robba C, Cardim D, Sekhon M, Budohoski K, Czosnyka M . Transcranial Doppler: a stethoscope for the brain-neurocritical care use. J Neurosci Res. 2017; 96(4):720-730. DOI: 10.1002/jnr.24148. View

Maralani P, Hassanlou M, Torres C, Chakraborty S, Kingstone M, Patel V . Accuracy of brain imaging in the diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Clin Radiol. 2012; 67(7):656-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.12.002. View

Marmarou A, Shulman K, LaMorgese J . Compartmental analysis of compliance and outflow resistance of the cerebrospinal fluid system. J Neurosurg. 1975; 43(5):523-34. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1975.43.5.0523. View

Vieira M, Cavalcanti M, Costa D, Eulalio K, do Vale O, Vieira C . Visual evoked potentials show strong positive association with intracranial pressure in patients with cryptococcal meningitis. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2015; 73(4):309-13. DOI: 10.1590/0004-282X20150002. View

Bothwell S, Janigro D, Patabendige A . Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and intracranial pressure elevation in neurological diseases. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2019; 16(1):9. PMC: 6456952. DOI: 10.1186/s12987-019-0129-6. View

Xu W, Gerety P, Aleman T, Swanson J, Taylor J . Noninvasive methods of detecting increased intracranial pressure. Childs Nerv Syst. 2016; 32(8):1371-86. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-016-3143-x. View

Marmarou A, Shulman K, Rosende R . A nonlinear analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid system and intracranial pressure dynamics. J Neurosurg. 1978; 48(3):332-44. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1978.48.3.0332. View

10.

R P, Gupta D, Shetty N, Bhushan A, Haskar K, Gogineni S . Transcranial Doppler for Monitoring and Evaluation of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2020; 11(2):309-314. PMC: 7214091. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1710086. View

11.

Cook A, Jones G, Hawryluk G, Mailloux P, McLaughlin D, Papangelou A . Guidelines for the Acute Treatment of Cerebral Edema in Neurocritical Care Patients. Neurocrit Care. 2020; 32(3):647-666. PMC: 7272487. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-020-00959-7. View

12.

Lee S, Kim H, Yun S . Optic nerve sheath diameter measurement for predicting raised intracranial pressure in adult patients with severe traumatic brain injury: A meta-analysis. J Crit Care. 2020; 56:182-187. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.01.006. View

13.

Rebolleda G, Munoz-Negrete F . Follow-up of mild papilledema in idiopathic intracranial hypertension with optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 50(11):5197-200. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-2528. View

14.

Sallam A, Abdelaal Ahmed Mahmoud M Alkhatip A, Kamel M, Hamza M, Yassin H, Hosny H . The Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive Methods to Measure the Intracranial Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2020; 132(3):686-695. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005189. View

15.

Balestreri M, Czosnyka M, Hutchinson P, Steiner L, Hiler M, Smielewski P . Impact of intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure on severe disability and mortality after head injury. Neurocrit Care. 2006; 4(1):8-13. DOI: 10.1385/NCC:4:1:008. View

16.

Caffery T, Perret J, Musso M, Jones G . Optic nerve sheath diameter and lumbar puncture opening pressure in nontrauma patients suspected of elevated intracranial pressure. Am J Emerg Med. 2014; 32(12):1513-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.09.014. View

17.

Wall M, McDermott M, Kieburtz K, Corbett J, Feldon S, Friedman D . Effect of acetazolamide on visual function in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and mild visual loss: the idiopathic intracranial hypertension treatment trial. JAMA. 2014; 311(16):1641-51. PMC: 4362615. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.3312. View

18.

Laemmer R, Heckmann J, Mardin C, Schwab S, Laemmer A . Detection of nerve fiber atrophy in apparently effectively treated papilledema in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010; 248(12):1787-93. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-010-1465-z. View

19.

Steiner L, Andrews P . Monitoring the injured brain: ICP and CBF. Br J Anaesth. 2006; 97(1):26-38. DOI: 10.1093/bja/ael110. View

20.

Karam E, Hedges T . Optical coherence tomography of the retinal nerve fibre layer in mild papilloedema and pseudopapilloedema. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005; 89(3):294-8. PMC: 1772541. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2004.049486. View