» Articles » PMID: 39523461

Thalamic Volumes and Functional Networks Linked With Self-Regulation Dysfunction in Major Depressive Disorder

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Pharmacology
Date 2024 Nov 10
PMID 39523461
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Self-regulation (SR) dysfunction is a crucial risk factor for major depressive disorder (MDD). However, neural substrates of SR linking MDD remain unclear.

Methods: Sixty-eight healthy controls and 75 MDD patients were recruited to complete regulatory orientation assessments with the Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ) and Regulatory Mode Questionnaire (RMQ). Nodal intra and inter-network functional connectivity (FC) was defined as FC sum within networks of 46 thalamic subnuclei (TS) or 88 AAL brain regions, and between the two networks separately. Group-level volumetric and functional difference were compared by two sample t-tests. Pearson's correlation analysis and mediation analysis were utilized to investigate the relationship among imaging parameters and the two behaviors. Canonical correlation analysis (CCA) was conducted to explore the inter-network FC mode of TS related to behavioral subscales. Network-based Statistics with machine learning combining powerful brain imaging features was applied to predict individual behavioral subscales.

Results: MDD patients showed no group-level volumetric difference in 46 TS but represented significant correlation of TS volume and nodal FC with behavioral subscales. Specially, inter-network FC of the orbital part of the right superior frontal gyrus and the left supplementary motor area mediated the correlation between RFQ/RMQ subscales and depressive severity. Furthermore, CCA identified how the two behaviors are linked via the inter-network FC mode of TS. More crucially, thalamic functional subnetworks could predict RFQ/RMQ subscales and psychomotor retardation for MDD individuals.

Conclusion: These findings provided neurological evidence for SR affecting depressive severity in the MDD patients and proposed potential biomarkers to identify the SR-based risk phenotype of MDD individuals.

References
1.
Halley A, Krubitzer L . Not all cortical expansions are the same: the coevolution of the neocortex and the dorsal thalamus in mammals. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019; 56:78-86. PMC: 6551301. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2018.12.003. View

2.
Redinbaugh M, Phillips J, Kambi N, Mohanta S, Andryk S, Dooley G . Thalamus Modulates Consciousness via Layer-Specific Control of Cortex. Neuron. 2020; 106(1):66-75.e12. PMC: 7243351. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.01.005. View

3.
. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022; 9(2):137-150. PMC: 8776563. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00395-3. View

4.
Redinbaugh M, Afrasiabi M, Phillips J, Kambi N, Mohanta S, Raz A . Thalamic deep brain stimulation paradigm to reduce consciousness: Cortico-striatal dynamics implicated in mechanisms of consciousness. PLoS Comput Biol. 2022; 18(7):e1010294. PMC: 9321468. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010294. View

5.
Takahashi N, Moberg S, Zolnik T, Catanese J, Sachdev R, Larkum M . Thalamic input to motor cortex facilitates goal-directed action initiation. Curr Biol. 2021; 31(18):4148-4155.e4. PMC: 8478854. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.06.089. View