» Articles » PMID: 39518564

Dyadic Effects of Attachment on Illness Acceptance in Patients with Breast Cancer and Spousal Caregivers: Sense of Coherence As a Mediator

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Nov 9
PMID 39518564
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Attachment styles have been found to play a significant role in adjustment to cancer. Couples often cope with breast cancer through an interdependent approach to the disease rather than just acting as individuals, and a sense of coherence is an important factor that influences these relationships. This study examined how attachment styles and sense of coherence impact illness acceptance in couples facing breast cancer within a dyadic perspective. Data were analyzed from 145 women with recently diagnosed breast cancer and their 145 partners, who attended clinic appointments related to medical treatment. They completed self-report measures of attachment, sense of coherence, and illness acceptance. Higher secure attachment and low insecure attachment scores were associated with a higher sense of coherence and better illness acceptance both in women and partners. Results of actor-partner interdependence mediation models indicated that most associations between attachment styles and illness acceptance were mediated by sense of coherence within both intrapersonal (actor-actor) and interpersonal (actor-partner) effects. The interdependence in attachment and sense of coherence brought noticeable benefits to couples' illness acceptance when facing breast cancer. In line with the salutogenic model, these relationships predominantly depended on the mediational function of comprehensibility, manageability, and meaningfulness, which determined cognitive and emotional reactions that influenced both patients' and spouses' acceptance of the disease.

References
1.
Hiebler-Ragger M, Nausner L, Blaha A, Grimmer K, Korlath S, Mernyi M . The supervisory relationship from an attachment perspective: Connections to burnout and sense of coherence in health professionals. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2020; 28(1):124-136. PMC: 7891645. DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2494. View

2.
ANTONOVSKY A . The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Soc Sci Med. 1993; 36(6):725-33. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90033-z. View

3.
Hinz A, Schulte T, Ernst J, Mehnert-Theuerkauf A, Finck C, Wondie Y . Sense of coherence, resilience, and habitual optimism in cancer patients. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2022; 23(2):100358. PMC: 9677073. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100358. View

4.
Janowski K, Steuden S, Pietrzak A, Krasowska D, Kaczmarek L, Gradus I . Social support and adaptation to the disease in men and women with psoriasis. Arch Dermatol Res. 2012; 304(6):421-32. PMC: 3401292. DOI: 10.1007/s00403-012-1235-3. View

5.
Karveli S, Galanis P, Mitropoulou E, Karademas E, Markopoulos C . The Role of Attachment Styles on Quality of Life and Distress Among Early-Stage Female Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2023; 30(4):724-739. PMC: 10560157. DOI: 10.1007/s10880-023-09940-w. View