» Articles » PMID: 39517348

Burnout in Assisted Reproduction Professionals: The Influence of Stressors in the Workplace

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2024 Nov 9
PMID 39517348
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background/objectives: Most of the research in assisted reproduction has focused on the stressful situation experienced by women or couples looking for a desired pregnancy; however, the stress experienced by assisted reproduction professional teams is seldom studied. The present study aims to evaluate burnout and its relationship with workplace stressors among assisted reproduction professionals.

Methods: A cross-sectional design was used to conduct an online self-assessment national survey, sent to all members of the Spanish Association for Fertility. The questionnaire contained sociodemographic and occupational questions about stressors in the workplace and the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI-HSS) to assess the three subscales of burnout: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and personal accomplishment.

Results: The percentages showing high emotional exhaustion and depersonalization in the whole sample were 41.8% and 43.2%, respectively. Additionally, low personal accomplishment was displayed in 42.6% of the respondents. Embryologists stand out for presenting the highest percentages of burnout (emotional exhaustion = 72.1%; depersonalization = 48.1%; low personal accomplishment = 48.1%), whilst psychologists showed the lowest percentages in high emotional exhaustion (32.3%) and depersonalization (24%), and gynecologists in low personal accomplishment (28.5%). Working under pressure was the stressor most experienced by the sample (76.6%) and the one that better predicted the three subscales of burnout.

Conclusions: This study highlights the close relationship between high levels of burnout and workplace stressors and shows the need to reduce workplace stressors to improve the well-being of professionals working in assisted reproduction, and, consequently, that of the patients they look after.

References
1.
Di Trani M, Spoletini R, Renzi A, Monaco S, Fedele F, Scaravelli G . The cultural representations and symbolizations emerging from Italian psychologists working in multidisciplinary assisted reproduction teams: A linguistic analysis with the emotional text mining. J Health Psychol. 2024; 30(3):528-542. DOI: 10.1177/13591053241251528. View

2.
Kasraie J, Kennedy H . Best practice for embryology staffing in HFEA licensed assisted conception centres-guidance from Association of Reproductive & Clinical Scientists. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2024; 27(1):2322729. DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2024.2322729. View

3.
Boivin J, Bunting L, Koert E, Ieng U C, Verhaak C . Perceived challenges of working in a fertility clinic: a qualitative analysis of work stressors and difficulties working with patients. Hum Reprod. 2017; 32(2):403-408. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew326. View

4.
Grill E . Role of the mental health professional in education and support of the medical staff. Fertil Steril. 2015; 104(2):271-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.05.027. View

5.
Rotenstein L, Harry E, Wickner P, Gupte A, Neville B, Lipsitz S . Contributors to Gender Differences in Burnout and Professional Fulfillment: A Survey of Physician Faculty. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2021; 47(11):723-730. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.08.002. View