Mapping the Spectrotemporal Regions Influencing Perception of French Stop Consonants in Noise

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2024 Nov 8

PMID 39516258

Authors

Geraldine Carranante

Charlotte Cany

Pouria Farri

Maria Giavazzi

Leo Varnet

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Understanding how speech sounds are decoded into linguistic units has been a central research challenge over the last century. This study follows a reverse-correlation approach to reveal the acoustic cues listeners use to categorize French stop consonants in noise. Compared to previous methods, this approach ensures an unprecedented level of detail with only minimal theoretical assumptions. Thirty-two participants performed a speech-in-noise discrimination task based on natural /aCa/ utterances, with C = /b/, /d/, /g/, /p/, /t/, or /k/. The trial-by-trial analysis of their confusions enabled us to map the spectrotemporal information they relied on for their decisions. In place-of-articulation contrasts, the results confirmed the critical role of formant consonant-vowel transitions, used by all participants, and, to a lesser extent, vowel-consonant transitions and high-frequency release bursts. Similarly, for voicing contrasts, we validated the prominent role of the voicing bar cue, with some participants also using formant transitions and burst cues. This approach revealed that most listeners use a combination of several cues for each task, with significant variability within the participant group. These insights shed new light on decades-old debates regarding the relative importance of cues for phoneme perception and suggest that research on acoustic cues should not overlook individual variability in speech perception.

References

Varnet L, Knoblauch K, Serniclaes W, Meunier F, Hoen M . A psychophysical imaging method evidencing auditory cue extraction during speech perception: a group analysis of auditory classification images. PLoS One. 2015; 10(3):e0118009. PMC: 4364617. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118009. View

Shultz A, Francis A, Llanos F . Differential cue weighting in perception and production of consonant voicing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012; 132(2):EL95-101. DOI: 10.1121/1.4736711. View

Phatak S, Lovitt A, Allen J . Consonant confusions in white noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008; 124(2):1220-33. DOI: 10.1121/1.2913251. View

Singh R, Allen J . The influence of stop consonants' perceptual features on the Articulation Index model. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012; 131(4):3051-68. PMC: 3339505. DOI: 10.1121/1.3682054. View

Schertz J, Cho T, Lotto A, Warner N . Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast. J Phon. 2015; 52:183-204. PMC: 4669969. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2015.07.003. View

Kingston J, Diehl R, Kirk C, Castleman W . On the internal perceptual structure of distinctive features: The [voice] contrast. J Phon. 2009; 36(1):28-54. PMC: 2720544. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2007.02.001. View

FUJIMURA O, Macchi M, Streeter L . Perception of stop consonants with conflicting transitional cues: a cross-linguistic study. Lang Speech. 1978; 21(4):337-46. DOI: 10.1177/002383097802100408. View

Varnet L, Meunier F, Trolle G, Hoen M . Direct Viewing of Dyslexics' Compensatory Strategies in Speech in Noise Using Auditory Classification Images. PLoS One. 2016; 11(4):e0153781. PMC: 4839691. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153781. View

WINITZ H, Scheib M, Reeds J . Identification of stops and vowels for the burst portion of (p,t,k) isolated from conversational speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 1972; 51(4):1309-17. DOI: 10.1121/1.1912976. View

10.

Stevens K, Blumstein S . Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants. J Acoust Soc Am. 1978; 64(5):1358-68. DOI: 10.1121/1.382102. View

11.

Gosselin F, Schyns P . RAP: a new framework for visual categorization. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 6(2):70-7. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01838-6. View

12.

Allen J . Consonant recognition and the articulation index. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005; 117(4 Pt 1):2212-23. DOI: 10.1121/1.1856231. View

13.

Bailey P, Summerfield Q . Information in speech: observations on the perception of [s]-stop clusters. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1980; 6(3):536-63. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.6.3.536. View

14.

Varnet L, Langlet C, Lorenzi C, Lazard D, Micheyl C . High-Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss Alters Cue-Weighting Strategies for Discriminating Stop Consonants in Noise. Trends Hear. 2019; 23:2331216519886707. PMC: 6856982. DOI: 10.1177/2331216519886707. View

15.

LISKER L . "Voicing" in English: a catalogue of acoustic features signaling /b/ versus /p/ in trochees. Lang Speech. 1986; 29 ( Pt 1):3-11. DOI: 10.1177/002383098602900102. View

16.

Li F, Trevino A, Menon A, Allen J . A psychoacoustic method for studying the necessary and sufficient perceptual cues of American English fricative consonants in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012; 132(4):2663-75. PMC: 3477194. DOI: 10.1121/1.4747008. View

17.

Clayards M . Differences in cue weights for speech perception are correlated for individuals within and across contrasts. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018; 144(3):EL172. DOI: 10.1121/1.5052025. View

18.

Liberman A, Delattre P, Cooper F . The role of selected stimulus-variables in the perception of the unvoiced stop consonants. Am J Psychol. 1952; 65(4):497-516. View

19.

Warren P, Marslen-Wilson W . Continuous uptake of acoustic cues in spoken word recognition. Percept Psychophys. 1987; 41(3):262-75. DOI: 10.3758/bf03208224. View

20.

Pisoni D, Studdert-Kennedy M . Perception of static and dynamic acoustic cues to place of articulation in initial stop consonants. J Acoust Soc Am. 1983; 73(5):1779-93. PMC: 3515858. DOI: 10.1121/1.389402. View