Inertial Measurement Units Worn on the Dorsum of the Foot and Proximal to the Ankle Can Provide Valid Slip Recovery Measures

Overview

Journal Gait Posture

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2024 Nov 8

PMID 39514916

Authors

Michelle A Morris

Christopher T Franck

Michael L Madigan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Slips are a leading cause of injury among older adults. Slip recovery measures are often captured using optoelectronic motion capture (OMC) systems that can be costly and typically require a laboratory setting. Inertial measurement unit (IMU) systems show promise as a lower cost, portable, and wearable form of motion capture.

Question: Can IMUs worn on the dorsum of the feet and proximal to the ankles be used to capture valid slip recovery measures?

Methods: Thirty older adults (ages 65-80; 18 females) were exposed to a laboratory slip while wearing OMC markers, IMUs on the dorsum of the feet, and IMUs proximal to the ankles. To evaluate the concurrent validity of IMU-based slip recovery measures using the OMC-based measures as our standard, we determined whether the IMU-based slip recovery measures differed between falls and recoveries, and evaluated the strength of correlation between IMU-based measures and OMC. We also defined the difference between foot IMU-based and OMC-based slip recovery measures to be the system offset, and compared the system offset variance between participant-placed IMUs and researcher-placed IMUs.

Results: All IMU-based and OMC-based slip recovery measures differed between falls and recoveries (p ≤ 0.008), and all IMU-based measures exhibited strong correlation (r ≥ 0.94) with OMC-based measures. The system offset variance was larger when foot IMUs were participant-placed than when researcher-placed for anterior-posterior slip distance (p = 0.032), but not other slip recovery measures (p ≥ 0.054).

Significance: IMUs worn on the dorsum of the feet and proximal to the ankle can provide valid slip recovery measures in a laboratory setting. This includes IMUs placed by participants on the dorsum of the feet that might be needed for the long-term monitoring of these measures by participants outside the laboratory setting.

Citing Articles

Sternum drop as a kinematic measure of trip recovery performance.

Lee Y, Madigan M J Biomech. 2025; 180:112499.

PMID: 39761614 PMC: 11772109. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112499.

References

Ruder M, Hunt M, Charlton J, Tse C, Kobsar D . Original article: Validity and reliability of gait metrics derived from researcher-placed and self-placed wearable inertial sensors. J Biomech. 2022; 142:111263. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111263. View

Rubenstein L . Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention. Age Ageing. 2006; 35 Suppl 2:ii37-ii41. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afl084. View

Allin L, Brolinson P, Beach B, Kim S, Nussbaum M, Roberto K . Perturbation-based balance training targeting both slip- and trip-induced falls among older adults: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2020; 20(1):205. PMC: 7291462. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01605-9. View

BRADY R, Pavol M, Owings T, Grabiner M . Foot displacement but not velocity predicts the outcome of a slip induced in young subjects while walking. J Biomech. 2000; 33(7):803-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00037-3. View

Rebula J, Ojeda L, Adamczyk P, Kuo A . Measurement of foot placement and its variability with inertial sensors. Gait Posture. 2013; 38(4):974-80. PMC: 4284057. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.05.012. View

Ojeda L, Adamczyk P, Rebula J, Nyquist L, Strasburg D, Alexander N . Reconstruction of body motion during self-reported losses of balance in community-dwelling older adults. Med Eng Phys. 2018; 64:86-92. PMC: 6398340. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.12.008. View

Zhou L, Tunca C, Fischer E, Brahms C, Ersoy C, Granacher U . Validation of an IMU Gait Analysis Algorithm for Gait Monitoring in Daily Life Situations. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020; 2020:4229-4232. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9176827. View

Cain S, McGinnis R, Davidson S, Vitali R, Perkins N, McLean S . Quantifying performance and effects of load carriage during a challenging balancing task using an array of wireless inertial sensors. Gait Posture. 2015; 43:65-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.10.022. View

Handelzalts S, Alexander N, Mastruserio N, Nyquist L, Strasburg D, Ojeda L . Detection of Real-World Trips in At-Fall Risk Community Dwelling Older Adults Using Wearable Sensors. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020; 7:514. PMC: 7492551. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00514. View

10.

Luukinen H, Herala M, Koski K, Honkanen R, Laippala P, Kivela S . Fracture risk associated with a fall according to type of fall among the elderly. Osteoporos Int. 2000; 11(7):631-4. DOI: 10.1007/s001980070086. View

11.

Allin L, Nussbaum M, Madigan M . Feet kinematics upon slipping discriminate between recoveries and three types of slip-induced falls. Ergonomics. 2017; 61(6):866-876. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1413212. View

12.

Troy K, Donovan S, Marone J, Bareither M, Grabiner M . Modifiable performance domain risk-factors associated with slip-related falls. Gait Posture. 2008; 28(3):461-5. PMC: 2556217. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.02.008. View

13.

Cham R, Redfern M . Lower extremity corrective reactions to slip events. J Biomech. 2001; 34(11):1439-45. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00116-6. View

14.

Berg W, Alessio H, Mills E, Tong C . Circumstances and consequences of falls in independent community-dwelling older adults. Age Ageing. 1997; 26(4):261-8. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/26.4.261. View

15.

Lockhart T, Woldstad J, Smith J . Effects of age-related gait changes on the biomechanics of slips and falls. Ergonomics. 2003; 46(12):1136-60. PMC: 2891178. DOI: 10.1080/0014013031000139491. View