Grading Sonographic Severity of Adenomyosis: A Pilot Study Assessing Feasibility and Interobserver Reliability

Overview

Journal J Ultrasound Med

Date 2024 Nov 8

PMID 39513570

Authors

Lisa M Trommelen

Robert A de Leeuw

Thierry Van den Bosch

Judith A F Huirne

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: The reported prevalence of adenomyosis ranges widely due to different study populations, diagnostic tests and criteria. Categorizing the severity of disease may prove important. This study aims to develop a semi-quantifiable sonographic method to grade the severity of adenomyosis and assess the feasibility and interobserver reliability of this method.

Methods: Cross-sectional pilot study performed at a gynecology outpatient clinic, included 35 premenopausal women with adenomyosis, not taking hormonal medication. Diagnosis required ≥1 direct sonographic feature of adenomyosis. Two-dimensional (2D) grayscale video clips and 3-dimensional (3D) volumes of the uterus of the first 5 patients were evaluated using 6 offline methods to assess feasibility. Feasible methods were analyzed for interobserver (n = 3) reliability (Fleiss kappa or intraclass correlation) and compared with current ultrasound methods (Cohen's weighted kappa and Spearman's rank correlation). Current methods include real-time estimation (mild/moderate/severe) and counting the individual sonographic features.

Results: "eXtended Imaging virtual organ computer-aided analysis (XI VOCAL) counting" (counting affected slices of 20 parallel slices in the 3D volume), "Multiplanar and 3D rendering (MPR) estimation" (grading volume by eyeballing in multiplanar render mode), and "2D-clip estimation" (grading volume in 2D-clips) emerged as feasible methods. "XI VOCAL counting" and "2D-clip estimation" demonstrated good interobserver reliability, whereas "MPR estimation" had poor reliability. Comparison with real-time estimation showed moderate reliability with all methods. "XI VOCAL counting" and "MPR estimation" correlated positively with the number of sonographic features.

Conclusion: "XI VOCAL counting" demonstrated to be feasible with good interobserver reliability to assess the severity of adenomyosis in an objective, systematic, and semi-quantifiable fashion and should be validated with large-scale studies for future use. Future studies should also explore the association between sonographic severity and symptoms of adenomyosis.

References

Rasmussen C, Hansen E, Ernst E, Dueholm M . Two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography for diagnosis of adenomyosis of the inner myometrium. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019; 38(5):750-760. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.033. View

Leung K, Ngai C, Chan B, Leung W, Lee C, Tang M . Three-dimensional extended imaging: a new display modality for three-dimensional ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 26(3):244-51. DOI: 10.1002/uog.1968. View

Naftalin J, Hoo W, Pateman K, Mavrelos D, Holland T, Jurkovic D . How common is adenomyosis? A prospective study of prevalence using transvaginal ultrasound in a gynaecology clinic. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27(12):3432-9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des332. View

Zhang W, Pan N, Han B, Li X, Li R, Ma C . Association Between Uterine Volume and In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Reproductive Outcomes of Infertile Patients with Adenomyosis. Reprod Sci. 2023; 30(10):3123-3131. PMC: 10556154. DOI: 10.1007/s43032-023-01210-2. View

Koo T, Li M . A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15(2):155-63. PMC: 4913118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. View

Naftalin J, Hoo W, Pateman K, Mavrelos D, Foo X, Jurkovic D . Is adenomyosis associated with menorrhagia?. Hum Reprod. 2014; 29(3):473-9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det451. View

Harmsen M, Van den Bosch T, de Leeuw R, Dueholm M, Exacoustos C, Valentin L . Consensus on revised definitions of Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 60(1):118-131. PMC: 9328356. DOI: 10.1002/uog.24786. View

Gordts S, Brosens J, Fusi L, Benagiano G, Brosens I . Uterine adenomyosis: a need for uniform terminology and consensus classification. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008; 17(2):244-8. DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60201-5. View

Exacoustos C, Lazzeri L, Martire F, Russo C, Martone S, Centini G . Ultrasound Findings of Adenomyosis in Adolescents: Type and Grade of the Disease. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021; 29(2):291-299.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.08.023. View

10.

Cheong K, Leung K, Chan H, Lee Y, Yang F, Tang M . Comparison of inter- and intraobserver agreement between three types of fetal volume measurement technique (XI VOCAL, VOCAL and multiplanar). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 33(3):287-94. DOI: 10.1002/uog.6255. View

11.

Schwertner-Tiepelmann N, Thakar R, Sultan A, Tunn R . Obstetric levator ani muscle injuries: current status. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 39(4):372-83. DOI: 10.1002/uog.11080. View

12.

Habiba M, Gordts S, Bazot M, Brosens I, Benagiano G . Exploring the challenges for a new classification of adenomyosis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020; 40(4):569-581. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.01.017. View

13.

Bird C, McELIN T, MANALO-ESTRELLA P . The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus--revisited. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972; 112(5):583-93. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(72)90781-8. View

14.

Harmsen M, Trommelen L, de Leeuw R, Tellum T, Juffermans L, Griffioen A . Uterine junctional zone and adenomyosis: comparison of MRI, transvaginal ultrasound and histology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 62(1):42-60. DOI: 10.1002/uog.26117. View

15.

Van Gruting I, Stankiewicz A, Van Delft K, Doumouchtsis S, IntHout J, Sultan A . Diagnostic test accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and pelvic floor ultrasound for diagnosis of levator ani muscle avulsion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 60(4):559-569. DOI: 10.1002/uog.24955. View

16.

Tellum T, Nygaard S, Lieng M . Noninvasive Diagnosis of Adenomyosis: A Structured Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy in Imaging. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019; 27(2):408-418.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.11.001. View

17.

Jayaprakasan K, Campbell B, Clewes J, Johnson I, Raine-Fenning N . Three-dimensional ultrasound improves the interobserver reliability of antral follicle counts and facilitates increased clinical work flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 31(4):439-44. DOI: 10.1002/uog.5301. View

18.

Andres M, Borrelli G, Ribeiro J, Baracat E, Abrao M, Kho R . Transvaginal Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017; 25(2):257-264. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.653. View

19.

Munro M . Classification and Reporting Systems for Adenomyosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019; 27(2):296-308. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.11.013. View

20.

Naftalin J, Hoo W, Nunes N, Holland T, Mavrelos D, Jurkovic D . Association between ultrasound features of adenomyosis and severity of menstrual pain. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 47(6):779-83. DOI: 10.1002/uog.15798. View