» Articles » PMID: 39509411

Fear of Missing Out's (FoMO) Relationship with Moral Judgment and Behavior

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2024 Nov 7
PMID 39509411
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Across three online studies, we examined the relationship between the Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) and moral cognition and behavior. Study 1 (N = 283) examined whether FoMO influenced moral awareness, judgments, and recalled and predicted behavior of first-person moral violations in either higher or lower social settings. Study 2 (N = 821) examined these relationships in third-person judgments with varying agent identities in relation to the participant (agent = stranger, friend, or someone disliked). Study 3 (N = 604) examined the influence of recalling activities either engaged in or missed out on these relationships. Using the Rubin Causal Model, we created hypothetical randomized experiments from our real-world randomized experimental data with treatment conditions for lower or higher FoMO (median split), matched for relevant covariates, and compared differences in FoMO groups on moral awareness, judgments, and several other behavioral outcomes. Using a randomization-based approach, we examined these relationships with Fisher Tests and computed 95% Fisherian intervals for constant treatment effects consistent with the matched data and the hypothetical FoMO intervention. All three studies provide evidence that FoMO is robustly related to giving less severe judgments of moral violations. Moreover, those with higher FoMO were found to report a greater likelihood of committing moral violations in the past, knowing people who have committed moral violations in the past, being more likely to commit them in the future, and knowing people who are likely to commit moral violations in the future.

References
1.
McKee P, Budnick C, Walters K, Antonios I . College student Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) and maladaptive behavior: Traditional statistical modeling and predictive analysis using machine learning. PLoS One. 2022; 17(10):e0274698. PMC: 9534387. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274698. View

2.
Bind M, Rubin D . When possible, report a Fisher-exact value and display its underlying null randomization distribution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(32):19151-19158. PMC: 7431075. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1915454117. View

3.
McKee P, Budnick C, Walters K, Bind M . The role of combat exposure on drinking behavior and subjective well-being: A Rubin Causal Model approach. Psychol Trauma. 2023; 16(4):610-617. DOI: 10.1037/tra0001546. View

4.
Duan W, He C, Tang X . Why Do People Browse and Post on WeChat Moments? Relationships among Fear of Missing Out, Strategic Self-Presentation, and Online Social Anxiety. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2020; 23(10):708-714. DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2019.0654. View

5.
Greene J, Haidt J . How (and where) does moral judgment work?. Trends Cogn Sci. 2002; 6(12):517-523. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)02011-9. View