The Need for Higher Levels of Evidence in Plastic Surgery

Overview

Journal Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open

Specialty General Surgery

Date 2024 Nov 7

PMID 39507308

Authors

Jennifer Wang

Charles Schafer

Thomas Steele

Jeffrey E Janis

Albert Losken

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based medicine in plastic surgery is essential to provide optimal care to individual patients. Level of evidence (LOE) and number of citations are metrics used to gauge quality of research and impact within a field, respectively. The objective of this study was to determine an association between LOE and number of citations within recently published articles in (PRS).

Methods: A review of original research articles published in PRS from January 2018 to June 2022 was performed. LOE was identified through the PRS website, and the number of citations identified via PubMed. Articles were further divided into sections of their corresponding topic.

Results: A total of 965 articles were reviewed, of which 21 (2.2%) were articles assigned level I evidence. There were 147 (15.2%) level II articles, 360 (37.3%) level III articles, 377 (39.1%) level IV articles, and 60 (6.2%) level V articles. The average number of citations per article was 2.72, and the average LOE of all included articles was 3.31. Level I articles had an average of 4.95 citations, whereas level II, III, IV, and V articles had averages of 2.95, 2.54, 2.64, and 2.71, respectively. Breast articles were cited on average 3.85 times each, more than any other type of article.

Conclusions: Our data show that articles assigned level I evidence in PRS trend toward higher numbers of citations compared with articles assigned lower LOEs. These findings should encourage investigators to publish high-quality research to advance the field of plastic surgery.

References

Cook D, Guyatt G, Laupacis A, Sackett D, Goldberg R . Clinical recommendations using levels of evidence for antithrombotic agents. Chest. 1995; 108(4 Suppl):227S-230S. DOI: 10.1378/chest.108.4_supplement.227s. View

Sinno H, Neel O, Lutfy J, Bartlett G, Gilardino M . Level of evidence in plastic surgery research. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127(2):974-980. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318200af74. View

Shiah E, Laikhter E, Manstein S, Comer C, Shen A, Lin S . Evaluation of Social Media Utilization by Academic Plastic Surgery Programs during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021; 148(5):825e-836e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008482. View

Joyce K, Joyce C, Kelly J, Kelly J, Carroll S . Levels of Evidence in the Plastic Surgery Literature: A Citation Analysis of the Top 50 'Classic' Papers. Arch Plast Surg. 2015; 42(4):411-8. PMC: 4513048. DOI: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.4.411. View

Kunze K, Polce E, Vadhera A, Williams B, Nwachukwu B, Nho S . What Is the Predictive Ability and Academic Impact of the Altmetrics Score and Social Media Attention?. Am J Sports Med. 2020; 48(5):1056-1062. DOI: 10.1177/0363546520903703. View

Azoury S, Mazzaferro D, Piwnica-Worms W, Messa 4th C, Othman S, Stranix J . An Update on Social Media in Academic Plastic Surgery Training Programs: The Rising Trend of Likes, Shares, and Retweets. Ann Plast Surg. 2020; 85(2):100-104. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002289. View

Butler J, Kaye I, Sebastian A, Wagner S, Morrissey P, Schroeder G . The Evolution of Current Research Impact Metrics: From Bibliometrics to Altmetrics?. Clin Spine Surg. 2017; 30(5):226-228. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000531. View

Pershad Y, Hangge P, Albadawi H, Oklu R . Social Medicine: Twitter in Healthcare. J Clin Med. 2018; 7(6). PMC: 6025547. DOI: 10.3390/jcm7060121. View

Nahas F, Ferreira L . Evidence-based medicine: the past and the future of plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 134(3):499e-500e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000474. View

10.

Ormseth B, Sarac B, Westvik T, Janis J . The Value of Case Reports in Plastic Surgery: An Analysis of 68,444 Articles across Six Major Plastic Surgery Journals. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023; 11(6):e5069. PMC: 10266519. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005069. View

11.

Asyyed Z, McGuire C, Samargandi O, Al-Youha S, Williams J . The Use of Twitter by Plastic Surgery Journals. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143(5):1092e-1098e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005535. View

12.

Covone J, ElHawary H, Abdulkarim S, Janis J . Revisiting Level of Evidence Ratings in Plastic Surgery: A Call to Action. Aesthet Surg J. 2024; 44(6):NP421-NP426. DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjae041. View

13.

Sullivan D, Chung K, Eaves 3rd F, Rohrich R . The Level of Evidence Pyramid: Indicating Levels of Evidence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Articles. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021; 148(5S):68S-71S. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000794868.07051.b4. View

14.

Scott B, Dirschl D, Landy D . Impact of Level of Evidence on Citation of Orthopaedic Articles. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021; 29(23):e1274-e1281. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00733. View

15.

Gabriel A, Maxwell G . Reading between the Lines: A Plastic Surgeon's Guide to Evaluating the Quality of Evidence in Research Publications. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019; 7(6):e2311. PMC: 6635181. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002311. View

16.

Om A, Ijeoma B, Kebede S, Losken A . Analyzing the Quality of Aesthetic Surgery Procedure Videos on TikTok. Aesthet Surg J. 2021; 41(12):2078-2083. DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjab291. View

17.

Nguyen A, Mahabir R . An Update on the Level of Evidence for Plastic Surgery Research Published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016; 4(7):e798. PMC: 4977126. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000796. View

18.

Hassanein A, Herrera F, Hassanein O . Challenges of randomized controlled trial design in plastic surgery. Can J Plast Surg. 2012; 19(3):e28-9. PMC: 3269337. View

19.

Rohrich R, Cho M . Evidence-Based Medicine in Aesthetic Surgery: The Significance of Level to Aesthetic Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 139(5):1195e-1202e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003269. View

20.

Maggio L, Meyer H, Artino Jr A . Beyond Citation Rates: A Real-Time Impact Analysis of Health Professions Education Research Using Altmetrics. Acad Med. 2017; 92(10):1449-1455. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001897. View