» Articles » PMID: 39497416

Conformations of a Low-complexity Protein in Homogeneous and Phase-separated Frozen Solutions

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2024 Nov 5
PMID 39497416
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Solutions of the intrinsically disordered, low-complexity domain of the FUS protein (FUS-LC) undergo liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) below a temperature T. To investigate whether local conformational distributions are detectably different in the homogeneous (i.e., single-phase) and phase-separated states of FUS-LC, we performed solid-state NMR (ssNMR) measurements on solutions that were frozen on submillisecond timescales after equilibration at temperatures well above (50°C) or well below (4°C) T. Measurements were performed at 25 K with signal enhancements from dynamic nuclear polarization. Crosspeak patterns in two-dimensional ssNMR spectra of rapidly frozen solutions in which FUS-LC was uniformly N,C labeled were found to be nearly identical for the two states. Similar results were obtained for solutions in which FUS-LC was labeled only at Thr, Tyr, and Gly residues, as well as solutions of a FUS construct in which five specific residues were labeled by ligation of synthetic and recombinant fragments. These experiments show that local conformational distributions are nearly the same in the homogeneous and phase-separated solutions, despite the much greater protein concentrations and more abundant intermolecular interactions within phase-separated, protein-rich "droplets." Comparison of the experimental results with simulations of the sensitivity of two-dimensional ssNMR crosspeaks to changes in populations of β strand-like conformations suggests that changes in conformational distributions are no larger than 5-10%.

Citing Articles

From molecular descriptions to cellular functions of intrinsically disordered protein regions.

Chen W, Fraser O, George C, Showalter S Biophys Rev (Melville). 2024; 5(4):041306.

PMID: 39600309 PMC: 11596140. DOI: 10.1063/5.0225900.

References
1.
Su Q, Mehta S, Zhang J . Liquid-liquid phase separation: Orchestrating cell signaling through time and space. Mol Cell. 2021; 81(20):4137-4146. PMC: 8541918. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.09.010. View

2.
Dignon G, Best R, Mittal J . Biomolecular Phase Separation: From Molecular Driving Forces to Macroscopic Properties. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2020; 71:53-75. PMC: 7469089. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-071819-113553. View

3.
Boeynaems S, Alberti S, Fawzi N, Mittag T, Polymenidou M, Rousseau F . Protein Phase Separation: A New Phase in Cell Biology. Trends Cell Biol. 2018; 28(6):420-435. PMC: 6034118. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.02.004. View

4.
Bielskute S, Garcia-Cabau C, Frigole-Vivas M, Szulc E, De Mol E, Pesarrodona M . Low amounts of heavy water increase the phase separation propensity of a fragment of the androgen receptor activation domain. Protein Sci. 2021; 30(7):1427-1437. PMC: 8197436. DOI: 10.1002/pro.4110. View

5.
Bremer A, Farag M, Borcherds W, Peran I, Martin E, Pappu R . Deciphering how naturally occurring sequence features impact the phase behaviours of disordered prion-like domains. Nat Chem. 2021; 14(2):196-207. PMC: 8818026. DOI: 10.1038/s41557-021-00840-w. View