» Articles » PMID: 39493001

Association Between Emotion Regulation and Body Image Concerns in a Group of Adolescent Boys: Interaction With the Internalization of the Sociocultural Body Ideal

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2024 Nov 4
PMID 39493001
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study examined the relationships of sociocultural body ideal internalization, difficulties in emotion regulation, and their interaction with body image concerns in a group of 423 Canadian adolescent boys. Participants were 12 to 17 years old and completed multiple self-reported questionnaires. Regression analyses and latent moderation structural equations were performed. Both variables were positively correlated with body dissatisfaction, drive for muscularity, restrained eating, and emotional eating. The internalization of men's sociocultural body ideal moderated the relationships between multiple difficulties in emotion regulation and some body image concerns. These results are in line with findings of other studies among adult men and women, and dominant theories of body image concerns, which have been derived especially from women populations.

References
1.
Cole P, Michel M, Teti L . The development of emotion regulation and dysregulation: a clinical perspective. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1994; 59(2-3):73-100. View

2.
Thompson R . Emotion regulation: a theme in search of definition. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1994; 59(2-3):25-52. View

3.
Compte E, Sepulveda A, de Pellegrin Y, Blanco M . Confirmatory factor analysis of the Drive for Muscularity Scale-S (DMS-S) and Male Body Attitudes Scale-S (MBAS-S) among male university students in Buenos Aires. Body Image. 2015; 14:13-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.02.005. View

4.
Tylka T . Refinement of the tripartite influence model for men: dual body image pathways to body change behaviors. Body Image. 2011; 8(3):199-207. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.04.008. View

5.
Stice E . Risk and maintenance factors for eating pathology: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2002; 128(5):825-48. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.825. View