» Articles » PMID: 39488415

Validation of the Adult Asthma Epidemiological Score: a Secondary Analysis of the EPI-ASTHMA Population-based Study

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Nov 2
PMID 39488415
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The A2 score is an eight-question patient-reported outcome measure that has been validated for ruling in (score ≥4) and ruling out (score 0-1) asthma. However, this screening tool has been validated in a cohort similar to the derivation cohort used. This study aims to validate the predictive accuracy of the A2 score in a primary care population against general practitioner (GP) clinical assessment and to determine whether the proposed cut-offs are the most appropriate.

Design: This accuracy study is a secondary analysis of the EPI-ASTHMA population-based study.

Setting: Primary care centres in Portugal.

Participants: Random adult participants answered the A2 score by phone interview.

Outcomes: Those with an A2 score ≥1 (plus 5% with an A2 score of 0) were invited to a diagnostic visit carried out by a GP to confirm or not a diagnosis of asthma. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results: A total of 1283 participants (median 54 (p25-p75 43-66) years; 60% women) were analysed. The A2 score showed high discriminatory power in identifying asthma, with an area under the ROC curve of 82.9% (95% CI 80.4% to 85.4%). The proposed cut-off ≥4 was the most appropriate to rule in asthma (specificity 83.1%, positive predictive value 62.4%, accuracy 78%). Similarly, the proposed cut-off<2 was the most suitable for excluding asthma (sensitivity 92.7%, negative predictive value 93.7%, accuracy 60.5%).

Conclusions: The A2 score is a useful tool to identify patients with asthma in a primary care population.

Trial Registration Number: NCT0516961.

References
1.
Bousquet J, Dahl R, Khaltaev N . Global alliance against chronic respiratory diseases. Allergy. 2007; 62(3):216-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01307.x. View

2.
Asher M, Garcia-Marcos L, Pearce N, Strachan D . Trends in worldwide asthma prevalence. Eur Respir J. 2020; 56(6). DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02094-2020. View

3.
Jarvis D, Newson R, Lotvall J, Hastan D, Tomassen P, Keil T . Asthma in adults and its association with chronic rhinosinusitis: the GA2LEN survey in Europe. Allergy. 2011; 67(1):91-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02709.x. View

4.
Burney P, Laitinen L, Perdrizet S, Huckauf H, Tattersfield A, Chinn S . Validity and repeatability of the IUATLD (1984) Bronchial Symptoms Questionnaire: an international comparison. Eur Respir J. 1989; 2(10):940-5. View

5.
Pekkanen J, Sunyer J, Anto J, Burney P . Operational definitions of asthma in studies on its aetiology. Eur Respir J. 2005; 26(1):28-35. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.05.00120104. View