» Articles » PMID: 39486091

Comparison of Time to Next Treatment or Death Between Front-Line Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DRd) Versus Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (VRd) Among Transplant-Ineligible Patients With Multiple Myeloma

Overview
Journal Cancer Med
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Nov 1
PMID 39486091
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (DRd) and bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) are the only preferred treatment regimens for patients with transplant-ineligible (TIE) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). As there are no randomized head-to-head studies of DRd versus VRd, this analysis aimed to compare real-world time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) or death in this population.

Methods: Patients with NDMM who received front-line (FL) DRd or VRd were identified from the Acentrus database (January 1, 2018 to May 31, 2023). Those with a record of a stem cell transplant or aged < 65 years were excluded to limit analysis to the TIE population. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline patient characteristics. A doubly robust Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare TTNT or death between cohorts.

Results: A total of 149 and 494 patients who initiated DRd and VRd, respectively, were identified. After weighting (weighted N = 302, weighted N = 341), cohorts had similar baseline characteristics. Of these, 98 (32.4%) DRd and 175 (51.2%) VRd patients either received a subsequent line of therapy or died, with a median TTNT or death of 37.8 months in the DRd cohort and 18.7 months in the VRd cohort (hazard ratio: 0.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.35, 0.81; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Treatment of TIE NDMM patients with DRd led to a significantly longer TTNT or death compared to VRd, evidenced by a 42% risk reduction, supporting the effectiveness of DRd over VRd as FL treatment in this patient population.

References
1.
Leleu X, Hulin C, Lambert J, Bobin A, Perrot A, Karlin L . Isatuximab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone and bortezomib in transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma: the randomized phase 3 BENEFIT trial. Nat Med. 2024; 30(8):2235-2241. PMC: 11333283. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03050-2. View

2.
Ramasamy K, Dhanasiri S, Thom H, Buchanan V, Robinson S, DSouza V . Relative efficacy of treatment options in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results from a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis. Leuk Lymphoma. 2019; 61(3):668-679. DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1683736. View

3.
Mikhael J, Ismaila N, Cheung M, Costello C, Dhodapkar M, Kumar S . Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: ASCO and CCO Joint Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37(14):1228-1263. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.18.02096. View

4.
Rajkumar S . Multiple myeloma: 2022 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2022; 97(8):1086-1107. PMC: 9387011. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26590. View

5.
Facon T, Kumar S, Plesner T, Orlowski R, Moreau P, Bahlis N . Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MAIA): overall survival results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021; 22(11):1582-1596. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00466-6. View