Salutogenic Environmental Health Model-proposing an Integrative and Interdisciplinary Lens on the Genesis of Health

Overview

Journal Front Public Health

Specialty Public Health

Date 2024 Nov 1

PMID 39484345

Authors

Jule Anna Pleyer

Laura Dominique Pesliak

Timothy McCall

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: The maintenance of health is a central objective of public health initiatives. Within the salutogenic paradigm, health promotion is focused on understanding the mechanisms of health development. Models serve as indispensable tools. One of the leading paradigms in the health sciences is the Salutogenic Model developed by Aaron Antonovsky. However, it lacks sufficient specification to reflect the complexity of the environmental dimensions that have emerged from research in environmental health science. The interactions and impact pathways between these dimensions on health status are not adequately distinguished. The objective of this study is to address this gap by extending Antonovsky's model to encompass environmental dimensions, that is, the interactions between humans and their environment. Furthermore, the study will integrate examples of models and theories from various disciplines to illustrate how a more comprehensive and holistic explanation of health development can be provided from an interdisciplinary environmental public health perspective.

Methodology: As part of a three-step approach, a Basic Model was first developed that integrates the five environmental dimensions-Natural, Built-Material, Socio-Cultural, Psycho-Social, and Individual-into the Salutogenic Model. Subsequently, narrative non-exhaustive literature research was used to identify interdisciplinary example models. The models were used to identify gaps in the Basic Model through a critical lens and to synthesize them into a more holistic model.

Results: The synthesis of fifteen interdisciplinary models resulted in the development of an integrative Salutogenic Environmental Health Model (SEHM), which comprises twelve principal components of health development and their interactions and pathways. Links to the original models permit the user to refer back to them.

Discussion: This integrative approach offers a comprehensive understanding of the development of health by synthesizing disparate explanatory models and theories from various disciplines through theoretical analysis. The various environmental dimensions and the determinants of health contained therein, as well as their mental and physical processing and the associated components of health development and their interactions, are summarized in this new model. The SEHM thus enables a differentiated analysis of health determinants and serves as an operational framework for health promotion and pathways to well-being in contemporary research contexts.

References

Salgado M, Madureira J, Mendes A, Torres A, Teixeira J, Oliveira M . Environmental determinants of population health in urban settings. A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1):853. PMC: 7271472. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08905-0. View

Ohly H, White M, Wheeler B, Bethel A, Ukoumunne O, Nikolaou V . Attention Restoration Theory: A systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2016; 19(7):305-343. DOI: 10.1080/10937404.2016.1196155. View

Barton H, Grant M . A health map for the local human habitat. J R Soc Promot Health. 2006; 126(6):252-3. DOI: 10.1177/1466424006070466. View

Schulz A, Northridge M . Social determinants of health: implications for environmental health promotion. Health Educ Behav. 2004; 31(4):455-71. DOI: 10.1177/1090198104265598. View

Grant M . The Health Map: Its genesis and widespread use in guiding urban spatial policy and action for population and planetary health. Perspect Public Health. 2023; 143(2):67-70. DOI: 10.1177/17579139231163732. View

Malsch A, Killin A, Kaiser M . Health-Oriented Environmental Categories, Individual Health Environments, and the Concept of Environment in Public Health. Health Care Anal. 2024; 32(2):141-164. PMC: 11133169. DOI: 10.1007/s10728-023-00477-5. View

da-Silva-Domingues H, Del-Pino-Casado R, Palomino-Moral P, Lopez Martinez C, Moreno-Camara S, Frias-Osuna A . Relationship between sense of coherence and health-related behaviours in adolescents and young adults: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):477. PMC: 8915532. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-12816-7. View

Alvidrez J, Castille D, Laude-Sharp M, Rosario A, Tabor D . The National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Framework. Am J Public Health. 2019; 109(S1):S16-S20. PMC: 6356129. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304883. View

Ngiam K, Khor I . Big data and machine learning algorithms for health-care delivery. Lancet Oncol. 2019; 20(5):e262-e273. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30149-4. View

10.

Odone A, Buttigieg S, Ricciardi W, Azzopardi-Muscat N, Staines A . Public health digitalization in Europe. Eur J Public Health. 2019; 29(Supplement_3):28-35. PMC: 6859512. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz161. View

11.

Yao W, Chen F, Wang S, Zhang X . Impact of Exposure to Natural and Built Environments on Positive and Negative Affect: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Public Health. 2021; 9:758457. PMC: 8655776. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.758457. View

12.

Grant M, Booth A . A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009; 26(2):91-108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x. View

13.

Lin H, Ye M, Chan S, Zhu J, He H . The effectiveness of online interventions for patients with gynecological cancer: An integrative review. Gynecol Oncol. 2020; 158(1):143-152. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.04.690. View

14.

Kivits J, Ricci L, Minary L . Interdisciplinary research in public health: the 'why' and the 'how'. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019; 73(12):1061-1062. PMC: 6872436. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2019-212511. View

15.

Lerner H, Berg C . A Comparison of Three Holistic Approaches to Health: One Health, EcoHealth, and Planetary Health. Front Vet Sci. 2017; 4:163. PMC: 5649127. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00163. View

16.

Azzopardi-Muscat N, Ricciardi W, Odone A, Buttigieg S, Zeegers Paget D . Digitalization: potentials and pitfalls from a public health perspective. Eur J Public Health. 2019; 29(Supplement_3):1-2. PMC: 6859515. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz169. View

17.

American Public Health Association . Workers' Compensation reform policy. New Solut. 2010; 20(3):397-404. DOI: 10.2190/NS.20.3.l. View

18.

Lawrence R, Forbat J, Zufferey J . Rethinking conceptual frameworks and models of health and natural environments. Health (London). 2019; 23(2):158-179. DOI: 10.1177/1363459318785717. View

19.

Vollmer T, Koppen G, Kohler K . [The impact of urban architecture on health: the PAKARA model]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2020; 63(8):972-978. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-020-03188-7. View

20.

Sukhera J . Narrative Reviews in Medical Education: Key Steps for Researchers. J Grad Med Educ. 2022; 14(4):418-419. PMC: 9380643. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00481.1. View