» Articles » PMID: 39482664

Development and Reliability and Validity Testing of a Medication Literacy Scale for Medical College Students

Overview
Journal BMC Med Educ
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2024 Nov 1
PMID 39482664
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Irrational drug use has become a global problem threatening human health. As future health professionals, medical college students' medication literacy (ML) is critical. Their mastery of medication-related knowledge will directly affect public medication safety in the future.

Methods: The initial scale was developed through a literature review and was modified through expert consultation and student interviews to form the initial scale with 14 items. In 2020, a questionnaire survey was conducted among students in a medical college for item analysis, reliability test, validity test and other analyses.

Results: The total Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.826 and split-half reliability was 0.852. The Cronbach's α coefficients for functional medication literacy, communicative medication literacy, and critical medication literacy were 0.901, 0.858, and 0.851, respectively. The item-level content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.833 to 1.000 (≥ 0.78). Factor analysis of 14 items showed that KMO = 0. 852(> 0.7) and Bartlett's spherical test p < 0.001, indicating that the data are very suitable for factor analysis. Three principal axis factors were extracted by principal component analysis, and the total variance interpretation rate was 69.031% (> 40%). The confirmatory factor analysis identified a three-factor model and showed goodness of fit indices for the scale: The χ²/df = 2.623, The Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) = 0.905, The Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.950, Normed Fit Index (NFI) = 0.922, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.938, and The Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.078.

Conclusion: A new scale for evaluating the medication literacy of Chinese medical college students was preliminarily developed, demonstrating good reliability and validity. Itcan be used as a preliminary measurement tool for assessing medical students' medication literacy. However, due to the limitations of this study, the practical application of the scale needs to be further examined in a larger sample and should be refined in future studies.

References
1.
Pantuzza L, do Nascimento E, Crepalde-Ribeiro K, Botelho S, Martins M, de Souza Groia Veloso R . Medication literacy: A conceptual model. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021; 18(4):2675-2682. DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.06.003. View

2.
Gentizon J, Hirt J, Jaques C, Lang P, Mabire C . Instruments assessing medication literacy in adult recipients of care: A systematic review of measurement properties. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020; 113:103785. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103785. View

3.
Vervloet M, van Dijk L, Rademakers J, Bouvy M, De Smet P, Philbert D . Recognizing and Addressing Limited PHarmaceutical literacy: Development of the RALPH interview guide. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018; 14(9):805-811. DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.04.031. View

4.
Kripalani S, Henderson L, Chiu E, Robertson R, Kolm P, Jacobson T . Predictors of medication self-management skill in a low-literacy population. J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21(8):852-6. PMC: 1831567. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00536.x. View

5.
Zijlmans E, Tijmstra J, van der Ark L, Sijtsma K . Item-Score Reliability as a Selection Tool in Test Construction. Front Psychol. 2019; 9:2298. PMC: 6336834. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02298. View