Older and Younger Job Seekers' Attention Towards Metastereotypes in Job Ads

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2024 Oct 30

PMID 39475861

Authors

Aylin Kocak

Nicolas Dirix

Wouter Duyck

Maaike Schellaert

Eva Derous

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Building on social identity theory and cognitive models on information processing, the present paper considered whether and how stereotyped information in job ads impairs older/younger job seekers' job attraction. Two eye-tracking experiments with older (Study 1) and younger job seekers (Study 2) investigated effects of negatively metastereotyped personality requirements (i.e., traits) on job attraction and whether attention to and memory for negative information mediated these effects. Within-participants analyses showed for both older and younger job seekers that job attraction was lower when ads included negative metastereotypes and that more attention was allocated towards these negative metastereotypes. Older, but not younger job seekers, also better recalled these negative metastereotypes compared to not negative metastereotypes. The effect of metastereotypes on job attraction was not mediated by attention or recall of information. Organizations should therefore avoid negative metastereotypes in job ads that may capture older/younger job seekers' attention and lower job attraction.

References

Devine P, Ash T . Diversity Training Goals, Limitations, and Promise: A Review of the Multidisciplinary Literature. Annu Rev Psychol. 2021; 73:403-429. PMC: 8919430. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-060221-122215. View

von Hippel C, Kalokerinos E, Haantera K, Zacher H . Age-based stereotype threat and work outcomes: Stress appraisals and rumination as mediators. Psychol Aging. 2018; 34(1):68-84. DOI: 10.1037/pag0000308. View

Ohman A, Lundqvist D, Esteves F . The face in the crowd revisited: a threat advantage with schematic stimuli. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001; 80(3):381-96. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.381. View

Johns M, Inzlicht M, Schmader T . Stereotype threat and executive resource depletion: examining the influence of emotion regulation. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008; 137(4):691-705. PMC: 2976617. DOI: 10.1037/a0013834. View

Koster E, Crombez G, Van Damme S, Verschuere B, De Houwer J . Does imminent threat capture and hold attention?. Emotion. 2004; 4(3):312-7. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.3.312. View

Tipples J, Young A, Quinlan P, Broks P, Ellis A . Searching for threat. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2002; 55(3):1007-26. DOI: 10.1080/02724980143000659. View

Muraven M, Baumeister R . Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: does self-control resemble a muscle?. Psychol Bull. 2000; 126(2):247-59. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.247. View

Oren N, Ash E, Tarrasch R, Hendler T, Giladi N, Shapira-Lichter I . Neural patterns underlying the effect of negative distractors on working memory in older adults. Neurobiol Aging. 2017; 53:93-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.01.020. View

Skinner I, Hubscher M, Moseley G, Lee H, Wand B, Traeger A . The reliability of eyetracking to assess attentional bias to threatening words in healthy individuals. Behav Res Methods. 2017; 50(5):1778-1792. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0946-y. View

10.

Inzlicht M, McKay L, Aronson J . Stigma as ego depletion: how being the target of prejudice affects self-control. Psychol Sci. 2006; 17(3):262-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01695.x. View

11.

Chai W, Abd Hamid A, Abdullah J . Working Memory From the Psychological and Neurosciences Perspectives: A Review. Front Psychol. 2018; 9:401. PMC: 5881171. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00401. View

12.

Theeuwes J, Belopolsky A, Olivers C . Interactions between working memory, attention and eye movements. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009; 132(2):106-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.01.005. View

13.

Chapman D, Uggerslev K, Carroll S, Piasentin K, Jones D . Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: a meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. J Appl Psychol. 2005; 90(5):928-44. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.928. View

14.

Hehman J, Bugental D . "Life stage-specific" variations in performance in response to age stereotypes. Dev Psychol. 2012; 49(7):1396-406. DOI: 10.1037/a0029559. View

15.

Veerapa E, Grandgenevre P, El Fayoumi M, Vinnac B, Haelewyn O, Szaffarczyk S . Attentional bias towards negative stimuli in healthy individuals and the effects of trait anxiety. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):11826. PMC: 7367300. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68490-5. View

16.

LeBlanc V, McConnell M, Monteiro S . Predictable chaos: a review of the effects of emotions on attention, memory and decision making. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014; 20(1):265-82. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-014-9516-6. View

17.

Vorauer J, Main K, OConnell G . How do individuals expect to be viewed by members of lower status groups? Content and implications of meta-stereotypes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998; 75(4):917-37. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.4.917. View

18.

Kaiser C, Vick S, Major B . Prejudice expectations moderate preconscious attention to cues that are threatening to social identity. Psychol Sci. 2006; 17(4):332-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01707.x. View

19.

Fox E, Lester V, Russo R, Bowles R, Pichler A, Dutton K . Facial Expressions of Emotion: Are Angry Faces Detected More Efficiently?. Cogn Emot. 2007; 14(1):61-92. PMC: 1839771. DOI: 10.1080/026999300378996. View

20.

Lamont R, Swift H, Abrams D . A review and meta-analysis of age-based stereotype threat: negative stereotypes, not facts, do the damage. Psychol Aging. 2015; 30(1):180-193. PMC: 4360754. DOI: 10.1037/a0038586. View