» Articles » PMID: 39475709

Evaluation of WhatsApp As a Platform for Teledermatology in Botswana: Retrospective Review and Survey

Overview
Journal JMIR Dermatol
Specialty Dermatology
Date 2024 Oct 30
PMID 39475709
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In emerging market countries in sub-Saharan Africa, access to specialty services such as dermatology is limited. Teledermatology is an innovative solution to address this issue; however, many initiatives have been tried without sustained success. Recently, WhatsApp has been used as a store-and-forward telemedicine communication platform for consultation and education in Botswana.

Objective: This study aims to describe the utilization of WhatsApp for teledermatology and the satisfaction levels of participating providers.

Methods: A 2-part pilot study was conducted. First, a retrospective review was performed of WhatsApp communications received by participating dermatologists in Gaborone, Botswana, from January 2016 to December 2019. Sender information, patient demographics and history, response time, diagnoses made, and follow-up recommendations were collected. Second, a 12-question cross-sectional survey was distributed to health care providers who utilized WhatsApp for teledermatology during this period. Descriptive statistics were then performed.

Results: There were 811 communication threads over the study period. The majority (503/811, 62%) of communications were consultations from providers inquiring about a specific patient, followed by multidisciplinary care coordination communications (90/811, 11%). Our in-depth analysis focused on the former. In 323 (64%) provider consultations, dermatologists responded within 1 hour. A diagnosis was made in 274 (55%) consultations. Dermatologists gave treatment recommendations remotely in 281 (56%) consultations and recommended an in-person dermatology visit in 163 (32%). Of the 150 health care providers surveyed, 23 (15%) responded. All respondents (100%) felt that there was a need for teledermatology and improved teledermatology education in Botswana. Moreover, 17 (74%) respondents strongly felt that the guidance received via WhatsApp was high quality, and 22 (96%) were satisfied with WhatsApp as a platform for teledermatology.

Conclusions: This retrospective review and survey demonstrated that WhatsApp is a quick, well-received, and sustainable method of communication between dermatologists and providers across Botswana. The app may offer a solution to the challenges providers face in accessing specialty referral systems, point-of-care education, and medical decision-making support for complex dermatologic cases in Botswana. The information gained from this pilot study can serve as the basis for future telemedicine studies to improve the implementation of teledermatology in Botswana and other resource-limited countries.

Citing Articles

Current management of skin conditions in Kenya: exploring teledermatology preferences and perspectives among providers.

Fernandez J, Kaderbhai H, Adams J, Adam M, Adam R Int J Womens Dermatol. 2025; 11(1):e196.

PMID: 39917274 PMC: 11801789. DOI: 10.1097/JW9.0000000000000196.

References
1.
McFarland L, Raugi G, Reiber G . Primary care provider and imaging technician satisfaction with a teledermatology project in rural Veterans Health Administration clinics. Telemed J E Health. 2013; 19(11):815-25. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0327. View

2.
Barbieri J, Nelson C, Bream K, Kovarik C . Primary care providers' perceptions of mobile store-and-forward teledermatology. Dermatol Online J. 2015; 21(8). View

3.
Lipoff J, Cobos G, Kaddu S, Kovarik C . The Africa Teledermatology Project: A retrospective case review of 1229 consultations from sub-Saharan Africa. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015; 72(6):1084-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.02.1119. View

4.
Martinez R, Rogers A, Numanoglu A, Rode H . The value of WhatsApp communication in paediatric burn care. Burns. 2018; 44(4):947-955. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.11.005. View

5.
Crisp N, Chen L . Global supply of health professionals. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370(10):950-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1111610. View