» Articles » PMID: 39474554

Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) Therapy and Lomustine Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Unresectable Progressive Glioblastoma

Overview
Journal Case Rep Oncol
Publisher Karger
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Oct 30
PMID 39474554
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy used concomitantly with maintenance temozolomide through second progression after radio-chemotherapy is associated with improved survival outcomes compared to adjuvant temozolomide alone in individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). Lomustine (CCNU) is frequently used as monotherapy or concomitant with other chemotherapy regimens as second-line treatment for recurrent GBM.

Case Presentation: We report a 59-year-old female patient diagnosed with -promoter methylated, isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype GBM (World Health Organization Grade 4) who received TTFields therapy concomitant with first- and second-line chemotherapy following partial resection. The patient experienced tumor pseudoprogression/progression after three cycles of maintenance temozolomide/TTFields therapy and again after a further two cycles of procarbazine/CCNU/TTFields therapy, and was then switched to CCNU/TTFields therapy. During 18 months of treatment with concomitant TTFields therapy and CCNU, the patient experienced regression/reduction of both tumor volume and perifocal edema with tolerable hematotoxicity and was able to maintain a high rate of TTFields therapy usage. The patient ultimately died after developing chemotherapy-related acute myeloid leukemia.

Conclusion: This patient case is reflective of the EF-14 study outcome using TTFields therapy beyond first progression concomitantly with chemotherapy. The observations from this case suggest that TTFields therapy concomitant with CCNU is a valuable treatment modality in patients with GBM, in this context.

References
1.
Toms S, Kim C, Nicholas G, Ram Z . Increased compliance with tumor treating fields therapy is prognostic for improved survival in the treatment of glioblastoma: a subgroup analysis of the EF-14 phase III trial. J Neurooncol. 2018; 141(2):467-473. PMC: 6342854. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-03057-z. View

2.
Gagnier J, Kienle G, Altman D, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D . The CARE Guidelines: Consensus-based Clinical Case Reporting Guideline Development. Glob Adv Health Med. 2014; 2(5):38-43. PMC: 3833570. DOI: 10.7453/gahmj.2013.008. View

3.
Gahrmann R, Smits M, Vernhout R, Taal W, Kapsas G, de Groot J . The impact of different volumetric thresholds to determine progressive disease in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab. Neurooncol Adv. 2022; 4(1):vdac032. PMC: 9000300. DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac032. View

4.
Rong L, Li N, Zhang Z . Emerging therapies for glioblastoma: current state and future directions. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2022; 41(1):142. PMC: 9013078. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-022-02349-7. View

5.
Stupp R, Wong E, Kanner A, Steinberg D, Engelhard H, Heidecke V . NovoTTF-100A versus physician's choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality. Eur J Cancer. 2012; 48(14):2192-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.04.011. View