Experiences of Patients With Cancer Using Electronic Symptom Management Systems: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis

Overview

Journal J Med Internet Res

Publisher JMIR Publications

Specialty Medical Informatics

Date 2024 Oct 28

PMID 39466301

Authors

Siying Zhu

Yan Dong

Yumei Li

Hong Wang

Xue Jiang

Mingen Guo

Tiantian Fan

Yalan Song

Ying Zhou

Yuan Han

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: There are numerous symptoms related to cancer and its treatments that can affect the psychosomatic health and quality of life of patients with cancer. The use of electronic symptom management systems (ESMSs) can help patients with cancer monitor and manage their symptoms effectively, improving their health-related outcomes. However, patients' adhesion to ESMSs decreases over time, and little is known about their real experiences with them. Therefore, it is necessary to gain a deep understanding of patients' experiences with ESMSs.

Objective: The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize qualitative studies on the experiences of patients with cancer using ESMSs.

Methods: A total of 12 electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EBSCOhost, Embase, PsycINFO, ProQuest, Scopus, Wanfang database, CNKI, CBM, and VIP, were searched to collect relevant studies from the earliest available record until January 2, 2024. Qualitative and mixed methods studies published in English or Chinese were included. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement checklist) and the ENTREQ (Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research) statement were used to improve transparency in reporting the synthesis of the qualitative research. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) checklist was used to appraise the methodological quality of the included studies, and a meta-synthesis was conducted to interpret and synthesize the findings.

Results: A total of 21 studies were included in the meta-synthesis. The experiences of patients with cancer using ESMSs were summarized into three major categories: (1) perceptions and attitudes toward ESMSs; (2) the value of ESMSs; and (3) barriers, requirements, and suggestions for ESMSs. Subsequently, 10 subcategories emerged from the 3 major categories. The meta-synthesis revealed that patients with cancer had both positive and negative experiences with ESMSs. In general, patients recognized the value of ESMSs in symptom assessment and management and were willing to use them, but they still encountered barriers and wanted them to be improved.

Conclusions: This systematic review provides implications for developing future ESMSs that improve health-related outcomes for patients with cancer. Future research should focus on strengthening electronic equipment and technical support for ESMSs, improving their functional contents and participation forms, and developing personalized applications tailored to the specific needs and characteristics of patients with cancer.

Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42023421730; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=421730.

References

Basch E . Patient-Reported Outcomes - Harnessing Patients' Voices to Improve Clinical Care. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376(2):105-108. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1611252. View

. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006; 4:79. PMC: 1629006. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-79. View

Ren L, Chen M, Jiang H, Wang Y, Xia L, Dong C . Perceptions of adult patients with cancer towards telemedicine: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024; 11(2):100360. PMC: 10825605. DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100360. View

Lehmann J, de Ligt K, Tipelius S, Giesinger J, Sztankay M, Voigt S . Adherence to Patient-Reported Symptom Monitoring and Subsequent Clinical Interventions for Patients With Multiple Myeloma in Outpatient Care: Longitudinal Observational Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e46017. PMC: 10481208. DOI: 10.2196/46017. View

Pereira-Salgado A, Westwood J, Russell L, Ugalde A, Ortlepp B, Seymour J . Mobile Health Intervention to Increase Oral Cancer Therapy Adherence in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (The REMIND System): Clinical Feasibility and Acceptability Assessment. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017; 5(12):e184. PMC: 5738545. DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.8349. View

Gomaa S, Posey J, Bashir B, Basu Mallick A, Vanderklok E, Schnoll M . Feasibility of a Text Messaging-Integrated and Chatbot-Interfaced Self-Management Program for Symptom Control in Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy: Pilot Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Form Res. 2023; 7:e46128. PMC: 10674151. DOI: 10.2196/46128. View

Tang F, Chan C, Choy Y, Loong H, Chow K, So W . A feasibility study on using tablet personal computers for self-reported symptom assessment in newly diagnosed lung cancer patients. Int J Nurs Pract. 2018; 24(4):e12658. DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12658. View

Tong A, Flemming K, Mcinnes E, Oliver S, Craig J . Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012; 12:181. PMC: 3552766. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-181. View

Whitehead L, Emery L, Kirk D, Twigg D, Brown D, Dewar J . Evaluation of a Remote Symptom Assessment and Management (SAM) System for People Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast or Colorectal Cancer: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Cancer. 2020; 6(2):e22825. PMC: 7752534. DOI: 10.2196/22825. View

10.

Langius-Eklof A, Christiansen M, Lindstrom V, Blomberg K, Nyman M, Wengstrom Y . Adherence to Report and Patient Perception of an Interactive App for Managing Symptoms During Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Descriptive Study of Logged and Interview Data. JMIR Cancer. 2017; 3(2):e18. PMC: 5686419. DOI: 10.2196/cancer.7599. View

11.

Chan C, Tam W, Cheng K, Chui Y, So W, Mok T . Piloting electronic self report symptom assessment - Cancer (ESRA-C) in Hong Kong: a mixed method approach. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2010; 15(4):325-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2010.10.002. View

12.

McCready T, Stabile C, Vickers A, Ancker J, Pusic A, Temple L . A Remote Symptom Monitoring Tool As Part of Ambulatory Cancer Surgery Recovery: A Qualitative Analysis of Patient Experience. JCO Oncol Pract. 2023; 19(8):595-601. PMC: 10424896. DOI: 10.1200/OP.23.00017. View

13.

Walker R, Tong A, Howard K, Palmer S . Patient expectations and experiences of remote monitoring for chronic diseases: Systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Int J Med Inform. 2019; 124:78-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.01.013. View

14.

Lai-Kwon J, Cohen J, Lisy K, Rutherford C, Girgis A, Basch E . The Feasibility, Acceptability, and Effectiveness of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Symptom Monitoring for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Toxicities: A Systematic Review. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023; 7:e2200185. DOI: 10.1200/CCI.22.00185. View

15.

Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

16.

Govindaraj R, Agar M, Currow D, Luckett T . Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Cancer Clinical Care Using Electronic Administration and Telehealth Technologies: Realist Synthesis of Potential Mechanisms for Improving Health Outcomes. J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e48483. PMC: 10716761. DOI: 10.2196/48483. View

17.

Darley A, Coughlan B, Maguire R, McCann L, Furlong E . A bridge from uncertainty to understanding: The meaning of symptom management digital health technology during cancer treatment. Digit Health. 2023; 9:20552076231152163. PMC: 9880573. DOI: 10.1177/20552076231152163. View

18.

Zhang L, Zhang X, Shen L, Zhu D, Ma S, Cong L . Efficiency of Electronic Health Record Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Cancer Immunotherapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(3):e224427. PMC: 8972037. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.4427. View

19.

Kalantari E, Kouchaki S, Miaskowski C, Kober K, Barnaghi P . Network analysis to identify symptoms clusters and temporal interconnections in oncology patients. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):17052. PMC: 9556713. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21140-4. View

20.

Crafoord M, Fjell M, Sundberg K, Nilsson M, Langius-Eklof A . Engagement in an Interactive App for Symptom Self-Management during Treatment in Patients With Breast or Prostate Cancer: Mixed Methods Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(8):e17058. PMC: 7445604. DOI: 10.2196/17058. View