» Articles » PMID: 39464259

N-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide, EGFR, and Progression of Kidney Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Without Heart Failure

Overview
Journal Clin Kidney J
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2024 Oct 28
PMID 39464259
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cardiorenal syndrome highlights the bidirectional relationship between kidney and heart dysfunction. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), which is the gold standard biomarker in heart failure (HF), may be an important biomarker for chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. However, NT-proBNP is negatively related with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). In this study, we investigated the association of NT-proBNP, eGFR, and progression of kidney disease in CKD patients without HF.

Methods: This multicentric retrospective cohort study recruited 23 860 CKD patients without HF, who had at least one NT-proBNP record from China Renal Data System database. Linear regression model evaluated the relationship between eGFR and NT-proBNP. Cox regression analysis assessed the association between NT-proBNP and CKD progression. Sensitivity analysis examined the robustness of the main findings.

Results: This study involved 23 860 CKD patients without HF, distributed across different CKD stages: 10 526 in stages G1-2, 4665 in G3a, 3702 in G3b, 2704 in G4, and 2263 in G5. NT-proBNP was negatively correlated with eGFR, particularly in stages 4-5 CKD. A 15-unit decrease in eGFR was associated with increases in log (NT-proBNP) levels by 1.04-fold, 1.27-fold, 1.29-fold, 1.80-fold, and 3.50-fold for stages 1-2, 3a, 3b, 4, and 5, respectively. After excluding patients who developed CKD progression within 1 year, the Cox regression analysis revealed that the relationship between NT-proBNP and CKD progression was not significant in stages 4 and 5. However, for stages 1-3, each standard deviation increase in log (NT-proBNP) was associated with a 26%, 36%, and 28% higher risk of CKD progression, with interaction ≤.001. The hazard ratios were 1.26 (95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.18 to 1.35), 1.36 (95% CI, 1.22 to 1.51), and 1.28 (95% CI, 1.14 to 1.43) for stages 1-2, stage 3a, and stage 3b, respectively.

Conclusions: Despite its strong inverse association with eGFR, NT-proBNP was positively associated with the risk of progression of kidney disease in CKD patients with stages 1-3 without HF. Future studies should investigate the effectiveness of NT-proBNP as a predictive biomarker for the progression of kidney disease across diverse racial groups and healthcare settings.

Citing Articles

Relationship between new-onset proteinuria and the volume of the non-donated kidney before and after donation in living kidney donors.

Ogata M, Miyauchi T, Osako K, Imai N, Sakurai Y, Shinoda K Clin Exp Nephrol. 2025; .

PMID: 39934590 DOI: 10.1007/s10157-025-02633-8.

References
1.
Januzzi J, Mohebi R, Liu Y, Sattar N, Heerspink H, Tefera E . Cardiorenal Biomarkers, Canagliflozin, and Outcomes in Diabetic Kidney Disease: The CREDENCE Trial. Circulation. 2023; 148(8):651-660. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065251. View

2.
Mills K, Xu Y, Zhang W, Bundy J, Chen C, Kelly T . A systematic analysis of worldwide population-based data on the global burden of chronic kidney disease in 2010. Kidney Int. 2015; 88(5):950-7. PMC: 4653075. DOI: 10.1038/ki.2015.230. View

3.
Jenks S, Conway B, McLachlan S, Teoh W, Williamson R, Webb D . Cardiovascular disease biomarkers are associated with declining renal function in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2017; 60(8):1400-1408. PMC: 5491560. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-017-4297-0. View

4.
Ascher S, Berry J, Katz R, de Lemos J, Bansal N, Garimella P . Changes in Natriuretic Peptide Levels and Subsequent Kidney Function Decline in SPRINT. Am J Kidney Dis. 2023; 83(5):615-623.e1. PMC: 11717373. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.09.018. View

5.
Takase H, Dohi Y . Kidney function crucially affects B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), N-terminal proBNP and their relationship. Eur J Clin Invest. 2013; 44(3):303-8. DOI: 10.1111/eci.12234. View