Comparison of Extracorporeal and Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion After Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Overview

Journal Am J Mens Health

Specialties Health Services
Public Health

Date 2024 Oct 28

PMID 39462910

Authors

Shuhui An

Lei Shi

Yuepeng Liu

Lixin Ren

Kun Zhang

Meng Zhu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

To explore the therapeutic efficacy of intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) and extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD) after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer through systematic review. This study systematically retrieved electronic databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang to include peer-reviewed studies comparing ICUD and ECUD after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD) were used to represent the pooled effect size and estimate its 95% confidence interval (CI). This study included 15 studies with good quality, involving 5,370 patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Meta-analysis showed that ICUD reduced intraoperative bleeding volume by 64.12 ml (95% confidence interval [CI]: [-100.95, -27.29]), significantly decreased the risk of blood transfusion (RR: 0.40; 95% CI: [0.24, 0.68]) and gastrointestinal complications (odds ratio []: 0.61; 95% CI: [0.47, 0.80]), with shorter postoperative time of exhaust (MD: -9.27; 95% CI: [-18.47, -0.08]) and oral intake (MD: -0.92; 95% CI: [-1.30, -0.54]). However, ICUD had a relatively longer surgical duration (MD: 30.84 min, 95% CI: [5.03, 56.66]). In addition, there was no statistically significant difference concerning the impact of ICUD and ECUD on the length of stay in the hospital (MD: -0.68d; 95% CI: [-1.79, 0.42]), overall complications (30-day: RR: 1.16; 95% CI: [0.93, 1.46]; and 90-day, RR: 0.85; 95% CI: [0.69, 1.04]) and readmission rate (30-day: RR: 0.96; 95% CI: [0.72, 1.27]; and 90-day: RR: 1.15; 95% CI: [0.80, 1.64]). ICUD after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer exhibits obvious positive effects, especially in reducing the risk of blood transfusion and gastrointestinal complications, and shortening postoperative time of exhaust and oral intake. The findings in this meta-analysis should be confirmed by multiple high-quality studies in the future.

References

Weber A, Vignat J, Shah R, Morgan E, Laversanne M, Nagy P . Global burden of bladder cancer mortality in 2020 and 2040 according to GLOBOCAN estimates. World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):237. PMC: 11021283. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04949-8. View

Pyun J, Kim H, Cho S, Kang S, Cheon J, Lee J . Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Total Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion: Comparative Analysis with Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016; 26(5):349-55. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2015.0543. View

Kingo P, Norregaard R, Borre M, Jensen J . Postoperative C-reactive protein concentration and clinical outcome: comparison of open cystectomy to robot-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy with extracorporeal or intracorporeal urinary diversion in a prospective study. Scand J Urol. 2017; 51(5):381-387. DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2017.1334698. View

Bertolo R, Agudelo J, Garisto J, Armanyous S, Fergany A, Kaouk J . Perioperative Outcomes and Complications after Robotic Radical Cystectomy With Intracorporeal or Extracorporeal Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion: Head-to-head Comparison From a Single-Institutional Prospective Study. Urology. 2019; 129:98-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.11.059. View

Shim J, Kwon T, Rha K, Lee Y, Lee J, Jeong B . Do patients benefit from total intracorporeal robotic radical cystectomy?: A comparative analysis with extracorporeal robotic radical cystectomy from a Korean multicenter study. Investig Clin Urol. 2020; 61(1):11-18. PMC: 6946824. DOI: 10.4111/icu.2020.61.1.11. View

Wilson T, Guru K, Rosen R, Wiklund P, Annerstedt M, Bochner B . Best practices in robot-assisted radical cystectomy and urinary reconstruction: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. Eur Urol. 2015; 67(3):363-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.009. View

Pruthi R, Nix J, McRackan D, Hickerson A, Nielsen M, Raynor M . Robotic-assisted laparoscopic intracorporeal urinary diversion. Eur Urol. 2010; 57(6):1013-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.12.028. View

Hu J, Chughtai B, OMalley P, Halpern J, Mao J, Scherr D . Perioperative Outcomes, Health Care Costs, and Survival After Robotic-assisted Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A National Comparative Effectiveness Study. Eur Urol. 2016; 70(1):195-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.028. View

Su S, Gu L, Ma X, Li H, Wang B, Shi T . Comparison of Laparoscopic and Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019; 17(5):e1048-e1053. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.06.007. View

10.

Satkunasivam R, Tallman C, Taylor J, Miles B, Klaassen Z, Wallis C . Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A Meta-analysis of Oncologic, Perioperative, and Complication-related outcomes. Eur Urol Oncol. 2019; 2(4):443-447. DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.10.008. View

11.

DerSimonian R, Laird N . Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7(3):177-88. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2. View

12.

Tan T, Nair R, Saad S, Thurairaja R, Khan M . Safe transition from extracorporeal to intracorporeal urinary diversion following robot-assisted cystectomy: a recipe for reducing operative time, blood loss and complication rates. World J Urol. 2018; 37(2):367-372. PMC: 6373357. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2386-4. View

13.

Ahmed K, Khan S, Hayn M, Agarwal P, Badani K, Balbay M . Analysis of intracorporeal compared with extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. Eur Urol. 2013; 65(2):340-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.042. View

14.

Lenfant L, Verhoest G, Campi R, Parra J, Graffeille V, Masson-Lecomte A . Perioperative outcomes and complications of intracorporeal vs extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a real-life, multi-institutional french study. World J Urol. 2018; 36(11):1711-1718. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2313-8. View

15.

Stang A . Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010; 25(9):603-5. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z. View

16.

Morizane S, Nakane K, Tanaka T, Zennami K, Muraoka K, Ebara S . Comparison of perioperative outcomes and complications between intracorporeal, extracorporeal, and hybrid ileal conduit urinary diversion during robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a comparative propensity score-matched analysis from nationwide.... Int J Clin Oncol. 2023; 29(1):64-71. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-023-02425-8. View

17.

Bochner B, Dalbagni G, Sjoberg D, Silberstein J, Paz G, Donat S . Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2014; 67(6):1042-1050. PMC: 4424172. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.043. View

18.

Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

19.

Xu C, Furuya-Kanamori L, Zorzela L, Lin L, Vohra S . A proposed framework to guide evidence synthesis practice for meta-analysis with zero-events studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 135:70-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.012. View

20.

Guru K, Seixas-Mikelus S, Hussain A, Blumenfeld A, Nyquist J, Chandrasekhar R . Robot-assisted intracorporeal ileal conduit: Marionette technique and initial experience at Roswell Park Cancer Institute. Urology. 2010; 76(4):866-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.12.082. View