» Articles » PMID: 39459545

Association Between Tomographic Characteristics of Pterygium and Preoperative Anterior and Posterior Topography Measured by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography

Overview
Journal Life (Basel)
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Oct 26
PMID 39459545
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The utilities of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) for characterization, differential diagnosis, postoperative monitoring, and evaluation/comparison of surgical techniques in pterygium are described. Through AS-OCT, it is also possible to study the corneal astigmatic effect of pterygium. Our purpose is to study the associations between the anatomical characteristics of pterygium and the corneal topography through AS-OCT. Fifty eyes with primary pterygium in a tertiary hospital were evaluated before surgery by measuring 10 anatomical variables of pterygium and 13 topographic variables using AS-OCT (Casia 2; Tomey Corp., Nagoya, Japan). Statistical analysis was used to study the association between them. Pterygium classified as flat pattern exhibited lower preoperative values of flat keratometry (K1), real flat keratometry (K1r), average keratometry (AvgK), and real average keratometry (AvgKr) compared to nodular ones. The flat pattern showed greater cylinder (CYL) and real cylinder (CLYr) values. The horizontal corneal invasion proportionally increased CYL and CYLr. Overall, larger anatomical pterygium measurements (limbus thickness (LimbusT), central pterygium thickness (CentreT), head pterygium thickness (HeadT), epithelial thickness at 1 mm (EpitT1mm), stromal thickness at 1 mm (stromT1mm), total thickness at 1 mm (TotalT1mm), total thickness at 2 mm (TotalT2mm), and total thickness at 3 mm (TotalT3mm)) resulted in lower anterior K1, K1r, AvgK, and AvgKr, and posterior K1 and AvgK values. CentreT was greater in astigmatisms against the rule than in oblique ones. This study demonstrates associations between preoperative topography and the NF (nodular or flat) classification of pterygium and its anatomical measurements assessed by AS-OCT.

References
1.
Lluch S, Julio G, Pujol P, Merindano D . What biomarkers explain about pterygium OCT pattern. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015; 254(1):143-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-015-3186-9. View

2.
Seifert P, Eckert J, Spitznas M . Topological-histological investigation of the pterygium. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001; 239(4):288-93. DOI: 10.1007/s004170100262. View

3.
Ozgurhan E, Kara N, Bozkurt E, Gencer B, Yuksel K, Demirok A . Comparison of conjunctival graft thickness after primary and recurrent pterygium surgery: anterior segment optical coherence tomography study. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014; 62(6):675-9. PMC: 4131315. DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.129765. View

4.
Hirst L . Recurrence and complications after 1,000 surgeries using pterygium extended removal followed by extended conjunctival transplant. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119(11):2205-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.021. View

5.
Kheirkhah A, Safi H, Molaei S, Nazari R, Behrouz M, Raju V . Effects of pterygium surgery on front and back corneal astigmatism. Can J Ophthalmol. 2012; 47(5):423-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.07.002. View