» Articles » PMID: 39458527

The Influence of Prone Positioning on Energy and Protein Delivery in COVID-19 Patients Requiring ECMO Support

Abstract

Background: Gastrointestinal dysfunction is a common complication of medical nutrition therapy in critically ill patients. Whether prone positioning leads to a deterioration in gastrointestinal function has not been fully clarified. Thus, we aimed to analyze the influence of prone positioning on the tolerance of medical nutrition therapy.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 102 SARS-CoV-2 infected patients with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (VV ECMO). Gastric residual volume (GRV) was used to assess the tolerance of enteral nutrition.

Results: Nutritional data were collected for 2344 days. Undernutrition was observed in 40.8%, with a significantly higher incidence on days in prone position (48.4% versus 38.6%, < 0.001). On days in supine position, significantly more calories were administered enterally than on days in prone position ( < 0.001). The mean GRV/24 h was 111.1 mL on days in supine position and 187.3 mL on days in prone position ( < 0.001). Prone positioning was associated with higher rates of GRV of ≥500 mL/24 h independent of age, disease severity at ECMO start, ECMO runtime and ICU length of stay (adjusted hazard ratio: 4.06; 95%CI: 3.0-5.5; < 0.001).

Conclusions: Prone position was associated with lower tolerance of enteral nutrition, as indicated by an increased GRV. As a result, reduced enteral nutritional support was administered.

References
1.
Ferrie S, Herkes R, Forrest P . Nutrition support during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in adults: a retrospective audit of 86 patients. Intensive Care Med. 2013; 39(11):1989-94. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-013-3053-2. View

2.
Cereda E, Guzzardella A, Klersy C, Belliato M, Pellegrini A, Sciutti F . Early caloric deficit is associated with a higher risk of death in invasive ventilated COVID-19 patients. Clin Nutr. 2021; 41(12):3096-3099. PMC: 7921717. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.02.020. View

3.
Yang Z, Hu Q, Huang F, Xiong S, Sun Y . The prognostic value of the SOFA score in patients with COVID-19: A retrospective, observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100(32):e26900. PMC: 8360480. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026900. View

4.
Farias M, Olivos C, Diaz R . Nutritional implications for the patient undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Nutr Hosp. 2015; 31(6):2346-51. DOI: 10.3305/nh.2015.31.6.8661. View

5.
Le Gall J, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F . A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA. 1993; 270(24):2957-63. DOI: 10.1001/jama.270.24.2957. View