» Articles » PMID: 39458078

Fungal Shoulder Periprosthetic Infections: A Systematic Review

Abstract

: Data regarding fungal PJIs of the shoulder are scarce. The present systematic review aims to identify and evaluate all published shoulder fungal PJIs in an effort to better understand the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to these infections. : A systematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines was conducted, locating all shoulder fungal PJIs. The initial search located 1435 articles. Data were collected on demographics, the causative fungus, antifungal treatment (AFT), surgical interventions, and infection outcomes. After screening and implementation of the inclusion criteria, a total of 10 articles, including 10 cases, were eligible. The sample's mean age was 62.44 years. Diabetes mellitus was the most common comorbidity (30%), while 70% were immunocompromised. spp. was the most common causative fungus (nine cases; 90%), while all cases were confirmed with cultures. In three cases (30%), there was bacterial co-infection. The mean duration of antifungal treatment (AFT) was 8.4 weeks, while the preferred agent was fluconazole (60% of cases), followed by amphotericin B (30%). Most cases (50%) underwent resection arthroplasty as part of the treatment, while two-stage revision arthroplasty was performed in 30%. Infection's eradication was reported in 90% of the studied cases. : The diagnosis and management of fungal periprosthetic shoulder infections are particularly challenging and require a multidisciplinary approach. The combination of antifungal therapy and tailored surgical strategies is crucial, but further research is needed to refine treatment protocols and address the unique considerations in shoulder PJIs.

Citing Articles

A Narrative Review of Fungal Periprosthetic Joint Infections of the Hip and Knee: Risk Factors, Microbiological Profiles, and Treatment Challenges.

Sznajder W, Jankowska-Polanska B, Tanski W J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39797289 PMC: 11721793. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010206.

References
1.
Blom A, Lenguerrand E, Strange S, Noble S, Beswick A, Burston A . Clinical and cost effectiveness of single stage compared with two stage revision for hip prosthetic joint infection (INFORM): pragmatic, parallel group, open label, randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2022; 379:e071281. PMC: 9645409. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071281. View

2.
Fiore M, Ferra L, Giannini C, Sambri A, Filippini M, Tedeschi S . Management of periprosthetic joint infection of shoulder arthroplasty: Single-stage versus two-stage protocols. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Shoulder Elbow. 2023; 15(1 Suppl):25-40. PMC: 10492529. DOI: 10.1177/17585732221116839. View

3.
Skedros J, Keenan K, Updike W, Oliver M . Failed Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Caused by Recurrent Candida glabrata Infection with Prior Serratia marcescens Coinfection. Case Rep Infect Dis. 2014; 2014:142428. PMC: 4241309. DOI: 10.1155/2014/142428. View

4.
Baptista M, Sevivas N, Ferreira N, Fardilha L, Varanda P, Mateus C . Cryptococcus magnus Periprosthetic Shoulder Infection: A Case Report. JBJS Case Connect. 2021; 10(4):e20.00507. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.CC.20.00507. View

5.
Ramamohan N, Zeineh N, Grigoris P, Butcher I . Candida glabrata infection after total hip arthroplasty. J Infect. 2001; 42(1):74-6. DOI: 10.1053/jinf.2000.0763. View