» Articles » PMID: 39455897

Measurable Residual Mutated IDH2 Before Allogeneic Transplant for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Abstract

Routine genetic profiling of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) at initial diagnosis has allowed subgroup specific prognostication, drug development, and clinical management strategies. The optimal approach for treatment response assessment for AML subgroups has not yet however been determined. A nationwide cohort of 257 adult patients in first remission (CR1) from AML associated with an IDH2 mutation (IDH2m) undergoing allogeneic transplant during the period 2013-2019 in the United States had rates of relapse and survival three years after transplantation of 24% and 71%, respectively. Pre-transplant clinical flow cytometry assessment was not useful in stratifying patients based on risk of post-transplant relapse or death. DNA-sequencing was performed on CR1 blood collected within 100 days before transplant. Persistent detection of IDH2m was common (51%) and associated with increased relapse and death compared to testing negative. Co-mutation at initial diagnosis with mutated NPM1 and/or FLT3-ITD was common in this cohort (41%) and use of these validated MRD markers provided superior stratification compared to IDH2m testing. Patients testing negative for IDH2m prior to transplant had low relapse-related death, regardless of conditioning intensity. Post-transplant relapse rates for those with persistently detectable IDH2m in pre-transplant remission were lower after the FDA approval of enasidenib in August 2017.

Citing Articles

Significance of Measurable Residual Disease in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Gang M, Othus M, Walter R Cells. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 39996762 PMC: 11853423. DOI: 10.3390/cells14040290.


Measurable residual mutated IDH1 before allogeneic transplant for acute myeloid leukemia.

Gui G, Ravindra N, Hegde P, Andrew G, Mukherjee D, Wong Z Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024; 60(2):154-160.

PMID: 39506075 PMC: 11810766. DOI: 10.1038/s41409-024-02447-4.

References
1.
Heuser M, Freeman S, Ossenkoppele G, Buccisano F, Hourigan C, Ngai L . 2021 Update on MRD in acute myeloid leukemia: a consensus document from the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party. Blood. 2021; 138(26):2753-2767. PMC: 8718623. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2021013626. View

2.
Roloff G, Lai C, Hourigan C, Dillon L . Technical Advances in the Measurement of Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Med. 2017; 6(9). PMC: 5615280. DOI: 10.3390/jcm6090087. View

3.
Ravandi F, Cloos J, Buccisano F, Dillon R, Dohner K, Freeman S . Measurable residual disease monitoring in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with lower-intensity therapy: Roadmap from an ELN-DAVID expert panel. Am J Hematol. 2023; 98(12):1847-1855. PMC: 10841357. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27087. View

4.
Metzeler K, Herold T, Rothenberg-Thurley M, Amler S, Sauerland M, Gorlich D . Spectrum and prognostic relevance of driver gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2016; 128(5):686-98. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-01-693879. View

5.
Venugopal S, Takahashi K, Daver N, Maiti A, Borthakur G, Loghavi S . Efficacy and safety of enasidenib and azacitidine combination in patients with IDH2 mutated acute myeloid leukemia and not eligible for intensive chemotherapy. Blood Cancer J. 2022; 12(1):10. PMC: 8789767. DOI: 10.1038/s41408-021-00604-2. View